Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Vitrectomy Machine Versus Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraxtion
The aim of our study is to compare between two techniques used for active SOR. The outcomes include efficiency and safety. Patients with silicon filled eyes and prepared for SOR 540 eyes of 505 patients (one eye in 470 patients, and both eyes in 35 patients) were enrolled in the study. All eyes underwent SOR using 23-Gauge PPV. The eyes were classified according to the surgical technique used for SOR into two groups:- Group A: SOR was performed using SO extraction program built in Optikon vitrectomy device Group B: SOR was performed using modified spring loaded syringe.
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Sohag Faculty of Medicine
Sohag, Sohag Governorate, Egypt
Start Date
January 4, 2022
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2026
Completion Date
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
200
ESTIMATED participants
Vitrectomy machine
DEVICE
Spring loaded syringe
DEVICE
Alaa A A Sinjab, Doctor degree in Ophthalmology
CONTACT
+20-01064037382alaa.abdelsadek@med.sohag.edu.egLead Sponsor
Sohag University
NCT07346560
NCT05331664
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06541574