COmparison of the Use of a PERforator Flap Versus Total Skin GRAft in the Management of Loss of Substance After Resection of Cutaneous Melanoma - Pilot Study
This study compares two groups of patients who underwent different standard-of-care reconstructive techniques following margin re-excision for stage II cutaneous melanoma, with the reconstructive approach selected during a multidisciplinary tumor board dedicated to melanoma management.
Age
18–any
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
You may be eligible if
Adult men or women (≥ 18 years)
Patients with cutaneous melanoma of any stage (I, II, or III) according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition (2017), diagnosed prior to surgery
Non-closable surgical defect after margin re-excision
You may not be if
Patients with microscopic or macroscopic nodal involvement when the sentinel lymph node has been removed
Patients with distant metastases identified on ultrasound and/or CT scan and/or PET-CT, when performed
Surgical contraindication to perforator flap reconstruction
Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Patients without health insurance coverage
Vulnerable individuals: persons deprived of liberty, under legal guardianship, or under curatorship
Clareo Health | COmparison of the Use of a PERforator Flap Versus Total Skin GRAft in the Management of Loss of Substance After Resection of Cutaneous Melanoma - Pilot Study
