C. difficile is a gram positive spore-forming anaerobic bacterium that can cause severe diarrhea through colitis. While the incidence of CDI is decreasing in Canada it remains a major cause of both nosocomial and community-acquired diarrhea. The annual incidence of CDI in Canada is 16,000 cases with 1,300 (8.1%) associated deaths. Estimates suggest that CDI is associated with annual economic losses of \~$150 million in Canada and that 23% of these losses are attributable to recurrent cases. Despite appropriate treatment, approximately 20-30% of CDI cases experience a recurrence (rCDI) and recurrent cases are substantially more costly and deadly. Fidaxomicin reduces the absolute recurrence rate of CDI by \~10% relative to 10 days of vancomycin; however, cost and availability prohibit widespread use. At the current price in Canada, fidaxomicin is not cost-effective. Thus, rCDI is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic cost, and prevention is a substantially unmet clinical need.
International CDI guidelines conflict on the recommended treatments for first episodes and first recurrences. The IDSA and ESCMID favor fidaxomicin for both, the ACG recommends fidaxomicin or vancomycin (P-T for first recurrences) for both, whereas the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease (AMMI) Canada favors vancomycin for both. These heterogeneous guidelines are mirrored by significant global practice heterogeneity in the use of fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin (10-14 days or as a P-T) for CDI. Since the publication of these guidelines, the TAPER-V trial (NCT04138706) found a 99.0% probability of superiority of a 4-week vancomycin P-T vs. 14 days of vancomycin for first CDI episodes and recurrences for the rCDI outcome at 38 days. Incorporating TAPER-V into a network meta-analysis of RCTs of treatments for first episodes and recurrences revealed that for the prevention of rCDI at day 38, vancomycin P-T was not significantly different from 10 days of fidaxomicin (Adjusted relative risk=0.73, favouring vancomycin P-T, 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI)=0.33, 1.61). However, only indirect evidence was available for this comparison because vancomycin P-T and fidaxomicin have never been compared head-to-head in an RCT.
Although the probability of superiority for vancomycin P-T vs. 14 days of vancomycin in TAPER-V for rCDI was 99.0% at 38 days, this probability fell to 73.8% at 56 days (i.e., the IDSA timeframe for rCDI), and 62.1% at 90 days. All the available RCT evidence for 10 days of fidaxomicin in the prevention of rCDI is within a 40 day timeframe. Thus, it is unknown whether the benefit of fidaxomicin also wanes over time.
By contrast to fidaxomicin, vancomycin P-T has greater worldwide availability and markedly reduced cost. If it is non-inferior or superior to fidaxomicin in terms of preventing rCDI over the long term (e.g., at least 56 days), it will represent a very important addition to international treatment algorithms.
To determine whether vancomycin P-T is an alternative to fidaxomicin, the investigators propose a non-inferiority RCT comparing vancomycin P-T to 10 days of fidaxomicin for the treatment of first episodes and first recurrences of CDI. Indeed, 68.2% of respondents to a recent clinician survey on CDI supported a trial on this comparison. The proposed trial will directly inform clinical practice on the potential of vancomycin P-T as a non-inferior and a lower-cost first-line therapy for CDI. This trial will also be the first to provide data on the longer term rCDI rate (beyond days 38-40) for fidaxomicin.
