Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
COLONYVAQ™-CRC, a Physics-aware, Quantum-Classical AI-Guided Personalized Neoantigen Peptide Vaccine, Administered in Combination With Standard Adjuvant Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) and Nivolumab 3 mg/kg in Patients With Completely Resected Stage III Microsatellite-stable (MSS)
This is an early phase I, single-arm, open-label clinical study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of COLONYVAQ-CRC, a physics-aware, quantum-classical AI-guided personalized neoantigen peptide vaccine, administered in combination with standard adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) and nivolumab 3 mg/kg in patients with completely resected stage III microsatellite-stable (MSS) / proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) colorectal cancer. An initial safety cohort of 12 patients will be enrolled and closely monitored for toxicity attributable to the experimental vaccine preparation. If, among these 12 patients, fewer than 3 develop experimental-preparation-related toxicity greater than grade 2 and no patient develops experimental-preparation-related grade 4 toxicity, the study will expand to enroll a total of 50 patients. Primary objectives focus on safety and tolerability of the combination regimen. Secondary and exploratory objectives characterize neoantigen-specific immune responses, ctDNA dynamics, T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotype evolution, tumor immune microenvironment features, and preliminary disease control (disease-free survival and overall survival) to inform subsequent phase II design.
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In stage III disease, recurrence remains frequent despite curative-intent surgery and adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed outcomes in mismatch repair-deficient / microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer, but microsatellite-stable / pMMR tumors typically exhibit a lower tumor mutational burden and a poorly inflamed, immunosuppressive microenvironment. As a result, conventional PD-1 blockade alone provides minimal benefit in MSS/pMMR disease. Earlier vaccine approaches in colorectal cancer focused on tumor-associated antigens such as CEA, MUC1, survivin, MAGE and multi-TAA peptide cocktails. These studies showed that peptide and dendritic-cell-based vaccines can induce antigen-specific T-cell and B-cell responses, yet objective responses were rare, clinical benefit was modest, and off-tumor toxicities were a concern because TAAs are frequently expressed in normal tissues. Tumor-specific neoantigens, generated by non-synonymous somatic mutations, are in contrast restricted to malignant cells, escape central tolerance, can elicit higher-avidity T-cell responses, and minimize off-tumor toxicity. Early colorectal and pan-cancer neoantigen trials, as well as shared-neoantigen programs such as SLATE-KRAS and fully personalized viral-RNA platforms such as GRANITE, have demonstrated that multi-neoantigen vaccination is feasible, safe, and immunogenic, particularly in low-burden or maintenance settings and when combined with checkpoint blockade. The adjuvant neoantigen dendritic cell vaccine plus nivolumab trial in resected hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases further supports the idea that personalized neoantigen vaccination in the minimal residual disease (MRD) setting can augment neoantigen-specific T-cell responses and potentially improve relapse-free survival. Oxaliplatin-based regimens (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) can induce immunogenic cell death, exposing calreticulin and other danger signals that enhance dendritic cell uptake and cross-presentation of tumor antigens. Nivolumab, by blocking PD-1, relieves inhibitory signaling on activated T cells. Combining a personalized multi-neoantigen peptide vaccine with immunogenic chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade is therefore expected to increase antigen release, improve antigen presentation, and augment effector function, potentially converting immunologically "cold" MSS tumors into more inflamed, "hot" lesions amenable to durable immune surveillance in the adjuvant setting. COLONYVAQ-CRC: Quantum-Classical, Physics-Aware Neoantigen Prioritization Most existing neoantigen pipelines treat epitope ranking as mainly statistical. COLONYVAQ-CRC introduces a physics-aware, quantum-classical AI layer, adapted from Tamavaq, to generate an auditable, mechanistic chain from sequencing to clinical peptide selection. For each candidate peptide-HLA pair p, the system constructs a unified feature representation Φ(p), which concatenates sequence-based, biological, quantum, structural, and energetic evidence: Φ(p)=\[e\_"CNN" (p),"" aux(p),"" z\_Q (p),"" ϕ\_"struct" (p),""ϕ\_"dock" (p)\]. The term e\_"CNN" (p) denotes a deep sequence/HLA embedding derived from convolutional or transformer models trained on large immunopeptidome datasets. The auxiliary block aux(p) compiles antigen processing and expression priors such as proteasomal cleavage likelihood, TAP transport propensity, transcript abundance, clonality and, when available, ctDNA/MRD information to approximate the effective antigen source strength. The quantum descriptor z\_Q (p) is a low-dimensional classical vector that parameterizes a quantum circuit embedding. The structural term ϕ\_"struct" (p) summarizes pocket occupancy and residue-residue contacts in modeled peptide-HLA complexes. Finally, ϕ\_"dock" (p) aggregates docking ensemble statistics including pose energies, dispersion and conformational diversity. Similarity between two candidates p and q is captured by a composite positive semi-definite kernel K\_"total" (p,q)=αK\_"CNN" (p,q)+βK\_"aux" (p,q)+γK\_Q (p,q)+δK\_"struct" (p,q)+εK\_"dock" (p,q), where the non-negative weights α,β,γ,δ,ε adjust the relative contribution of each modality. Because each component kernel is constructed to be positive semi-definite, their non-negative linear combination remains positive semi-definite, ensuring that K\_"total" can be used consistently in kernel logistic regression or related methods. A decision function can be written as f(p)=∑\_(i=1)\^M▒α\_i K\_"total" (p,p\_i)+b, where {p\_i } are training peptides and α\_i,b are learned coefficients. The immunogenicity probability is then modeled as I ̂(p)=σ(f(p)), where σ(z)=1/(1+e\^(-z)) is the logistic function. On the quantum side, each peptide x is encoded as a normalized state ∣ψ(x)⟩ in a Hilbert space H of dimension 2\^n, constructed via a feature map U(z\_Q (x),θ) acting on a reference state ∣0⟩\^(⊗n): ∣ψ(x)⟩=U(z\_Q (x),θ)" "∣0⟩\^(⊗n). The overlap between two peptide states is ⟨ψ(x)∣ψ(y)⟩. Quantum-geometric similarity is quantified by the Fubini-Study distance d\_"FS" (x,y)=arccos(∣⟨ψ(x)∣ψ(y)⟩∣), which lies in \[0ⓜ,π/2\], where d\_"FS" =0 corresponds to identical rays and d\_"FS" =π/2 to orthogonal states. From this distance, a quantum similarity kernel is defined as K\_q (x,y)=〖∣⟨ψ(x)∣ψ(y)⟩∣〗\^2=〖cos〗\^2 (d\_"FS" (x,y)). This kernel can be interpreted as the probability that the state ∣ψ(x)⟩ is projected onto ∣ψ(y)⟩. When low-sequence-identity peptides share higher-order physicochemical structure, they may map to nearby points on this complex projective manifold, generating large K\_q values even when classical sequence similarity is low. The internal structure and entanglement of ∣ψ(x)⟩ are monitored by forming reduced density matrices on subsystems. For a bipartition into subsystems A and B, the reduced state is ρ\_A (x)=Tr\_B (∣ψ(x)⟩⟨ψ(x)∣). The von Neumann entropy S\_A (x)=-Tr\[ρ\_A (x)logρ\_A (x)\] quantifies entanglement between A and B. A regularization term encourages entropy within a target range, avoiding trivial product states (too little entanglement) and excessively entangled states that can be numerically unstable and difficult to approximate on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. The sensitivity of the quantum embedding to parameter changes is characterized by the quantum Fisher information matrix F(θ) with entries F\_ij (θ)=R\[⟨∂\_i ψ∣∂\_j ψ⟩-⟨∂\_i ψ∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣∂\_j ψ⟩\], where ∣∂\_i ψ⟩=∂∣ψ(θ)⟩/∂θ\_i. Ill-conditioned Fisher matrices, with very small eigenvalues, can lead to large variances in parameter estimates and unstable kernel values. COLONYVAQ therefore introduces a penalty proportional to tr(F(θ)\^(-1)), which diverges when eigenvalues approach zero; minimizing this term nudges optimization toward parameter regions where all directions in parameter space are well informed by the data. Energetics are treated in a thermodynamically calibrated way. For each peptide-HLA docking pose i with standard free energy ΔG\_i\^∘, the microstate association and dissociation constants are K\_(a,i)=exp(ⓜ (ΔG\_i\^∘)/RT),K\_(d,i)=exp((ΔG\_i\^∘)/RT), with R=1.987×10\^(-3) " " kcal⋅mol\^(-1)⋅K\^(-1) and T=310"" K, such that RT≈0.616" " kcal⋅mol\^(-1). The docking ensemble is summarized as a Boltzmann-weighted effective association constant K\_a\^"eff" =∑\_i▒w\_i exp(ⓜ-(ΔG\_i\^∘)/RT),∑\_i▒w\_i =1, yielding an effective free energy ΔG\_"eff" \^∘=-RTlnK\_a\^"eff" and corresponding dissociation constant K\_d\^"eff" =1/K\_a\^"eff" . These values are reported in units familiar to experimentalists (kcal·mol-¹ for ΔG\_"eff" \^∘, nM for K\_d\^"eff" ). If the spread of free energies in the ensemble is σ\_ΔG, then the associated uncertainty in K\_dcan be expressed multiplicatively as exp(±σ\_ΔG/(RT)). For example, at T=310"" K, a change of 1.2"" kcal⋅mol\^(-1) in ΔG\^∘ changes K\_d by a factor of approximately exp(1.2/0.616)≈6.3. A docking loss term L\_"dock" =λ\_1 E ˉ+λ\_2 σ\_E, where E ˉ and σ\_E are the mean and standard deviation of docking energies, biases the model toward low-energy, low-variance ensembles that are empirically associated with robust peptide-MHC display. On top of Φ(p) and the kernel K\_"total" , COLONYVAQ trains a calibrated logistic head I ̂(p)=σ(w\^⊤ Φ(p)+b), which is interpreted as the probability that peptide p is recognized by T cells, optimized for both discrimination (for example AUC) and calibration (for example Brier score, expected calibration error). In parallel, a linear thermodynamic head predicts (ΔG) ̂\^∘ (p)=η\^⊤ Φ(p)+η\_0, from which a predicted dissociation constant K ̂\_d (p)=exp((ΔG) ̂\^∘ (p)/(RT)) is derived. The total loss couples prediction, structure, docking and quantum Fisher regularization into a single objective L=L\_"pred" +L\_"struct" +L\_"dock" +L\_"QFIM", with L\_"QFIM" proportional to tr(F(θ)\^(-1)). Candidate peptides are passed through a three-gate "physics + geometry + immunology" oracle. First, a quantum-geometric gate requires that the Fubini-Study distance between ∣ψ(x)⟩ and a centroid ∣ψ(P)⟩ of empirically validated immunogenic peptides satisfy d\_"FS" (ψ(x),ψ(P))≤d\^"\\\*" . Second, a thermodynamic gate requires that the effective free energy and dissociation constant meet minimum binding strength criteria, ΔG\_"eff" \^∘ (x)≤ΔG\^"\\\*" or equivalently K\_d\^"eff" (x)≤K\_d\^"\\\*" . Third, an immunogenicity gate requires that the calibrated probability exceed a threshold, I ̂(x)≥I\^"\\\*" . Let the total number of candidates be N, with M peptides passing all three filters. In abstract quantum terms, a uniform superposition over all candidates is ∣Ψ\_0⟩=1/√N ∑\_(j=1)\^N▒〖∣j⟩,which can be decomposed into "marked" and "unmarked" subspaces as ∣Ψ\_0⟩=sinθ" "∣Ψ\_"good" ⟩+cosθ" "∣Ψ\_"bad" ⟩, where 〖sin〗\^2 θ=M/N. A Grover-like amplitude amplification operator G is defined as the product of an oracle O that flips the phase of marked states and a diffusion operator D that reflects about ∣Ψ\_0⟩. After r iterations, the state becomes ∣Ψ\_r⟩=G\^r∣Ψ\_0⟩=sin((2r+1)θ)∣Ψ\_"good" ⟩+cos((2r+1)θ)∣Ψ\_"bad" ⟩, and the probability of measuring a marked index is P\_r=〖sin〗\^2 ((2r+1)θ). When θ is small (few good candidates), the optimal number of iterations that maximizes P\_r is approximately r\_"opt" ≈π/4 √(N/M), but in the NISQ regime and in the presence of uncertainty in M, COLONYVAQ uses a small number of iterations (typically one to three) to reliably amplify the weight of marked peptides without over-rotation. In practice, this Grover-style step is simulated or approximated in a manner compatible with available hardware and serves to focus GMP peptide synthesis on a compact, high-confidence subset. Within the set of marked peptides, residual ties are broken using a composite score S(x)=αK\_q (x,P)+β" " σ" " ((I ̂(x)-I\^"\\\*" )/τ\_I )+γ" " σ" " ((K\_d\^"\\\*" -K\_d\^"eff" (x))/τ\_K ), where K\_q (x,P)=〖∣⟨ψ(x)∣ψ(P)⟩∣〗\^2, τ\_I and τ\_K set the steepness of transitions, and σ is the logistic function. This expression makes explicit how similarity to known positive controls, modeled immune potency, and predicted binding strength jointly determine the final ranking used to define the COLONYVAQ-CRC peptide cargo for each patient. Rationale for Combination with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX and Nivolumab Oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines are standard components of adjuvant therapy in stage III colorectal cancer and can induce immunogenic cell death, increasing the release of tumor antigens and danger signals, which in turn enhances dendritic cell activation and antigen cross-presentation. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks blocks PD-1, preventing exhaustion and functional suppression of vaccine-induced and chemotherapy-released tumor-specific T cells. The quantum-classical COLONYVAQ-CRC engine is intended to maximize the quality of neoantigen targets; immunogenic chemotherapy increases antigen availability; and PD-1 blockade sustains T-cell effector function. The early phase I trial will test the safety and feasibility of this three-component strategy in the adjuvant MRD setting and generate preliminary immune and molecular response data.
Age
All ages
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Biogenea Pharmaeuticals Ltd
Thessaloniki, Greece
Start Date
February 2, 2026
Primary Completion Date
December 2, 2030
Completion Date
December 2, 2031
Last Updated
January 9, 2026
12
ESTIMATED participants
Experimental: COLONYVAQ-CRC + mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX + Nivolumab
BIOLOGICAL
Lead Sponsor
Biogenea Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Collaborators
NCT05759728
NCT07213570
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT07018869