Evaluation of Irisin Levels in Adult Forearm Fracture Surgery Under Infraclavicular Block and General Anesthesia

This randomized prospective study evaluates the effect of general anesthesia versus infraclavicular nerve block on perioperative serum irisin levels in adults undergoing forearm fracture surgery. Irisin levels will be measured preoperatively, at 30 minutes postoperatively, and at 24 hours postoperatively. The association between irisin changes and fracture healing will be explored as a secondary outcome.

Forearm fractures are common injuries in adults and frequently require surgical intervention due to instability and displacement. Postoperative recovery quality and fracture healing are influenced by multiple factors, including the type of anesthesia administered during surgery. However, the biochemical and metabolic effects of different anesthesia techniques on bone healing remain insufficiently explored. Irisin is a myokine derived from the cleavage of fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 5 (FNDC5) and plays a significant role in muscle-bone crosstalk. Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that irisin promotes osteoblast differentiation, inhibits osteocyte apoptosis, and contributes to bone homeostasis and fracture healing. Despite its potential importance, the relationship between anesthesia techniques and perioperative irisin levels has not been previously investigated. This single-center, randomized, prospective clinical trial aims to compare the effects of general anesthesia and infraclavicular brachial plexus block on perioperative serum irisin levels in adult patients undergoing elective forearm fracture surgery. Patients aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: general anesthesia (Group G) or infraclavicular block (Group B). Serum irisin levels will be measured at three time points: preoperatively, 30 minutes postoperatively, and 24 hours postoperatively. In addition to biochemical outcomes, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation), analgesic consumption, and demographic data will be recorded. Postoperative radiographs will be evaluated to monitor fracture healing and callus formation, which will be analyzed as a secondary outcome in relation to changes in irisin levels. The primary outcome of the study is the comparison of perioperative changes in serum irisin levels between the two anesthesia techniques. Secondary outcomes include the relationship between irisin level changes and radiological fracture healing, as well as differences in perioperative physiological stress responses. This study aims to improve understanding of the metabolic and biochemical effects of anesthesia techniques on bone healing. The findings may contribute to the selection of anesthesia methods that minimize physiological stress and potentially enhance postoperative recovery and fracture healing in patients undergoing forearm fracture surgery.