Background and Rationale Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) globally. The operational definition of sepsis (Sepsis-3) relies on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. However, the original SOFA score, developed in 1996, predates modern critical care interventions such as High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation, and contemporary vasopressor strategies. Consequently, the original score has limitations in accurately characterizing organ dysfunction in the modern ICU setting.
The recently updated SOFA-2 score (JAMA, 2025) addresses these shortcomings by revising scoring thresholds and incorporating modern respiratory and cardiovascular support modalities. While validated in large international cohorts, the SOFA-2 score requires local validation in Turkey to account for regional differences in patient demographics, genetics, and healthcare infrastructure before widespread clinical adoption.
Study Design This is a multicenter, prospective, hybrid observational study comprising two distinct components to maximize data utility while minimizing data collection burden:
Prospective Validation Cohort (Primary): A 7-day recruitment window will be established (e.g., January 2026). During this period, all consecutive adult patients (aged 18 and older) admitted to participating ICUs will be enrolled. Baseline organ dysfunction scores will be calculated using the worst physiological values recorded during the first 24 hours of admission. These patients will be followed up for 30-day all-cause mortality to validate the predictive performance (discrimination and calibration) of the SOFA-2 score compared to the original SOFA-1 score.
Point-Prevalence Cohort (Secondary): Within the 7-day window, a specific 24-hour period will be designated as the "Index Day." This cross-sectional component will include all patients present in the ICU at 08:00 AM on the index day, plus any new admissions over the subsequent 24 hours. This cohort will be used specifically to determine the point prevalence of Sepsis-3 and septic shock in Turkish ICUs, providing a snapshot of the current epidemiological burden compared to historical data.
Data Collection Methodology To ensure standardization and eliminate inter-rater variability, participating centers will not manually calculate scores. Instead, researchers will record raw physiological, laboratory, and therapeutic variables (e.g., PaO2, platelet count, exact vasopressor doses, Glasgow Coma Scale) into a central electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). The study algorithms will then centrally and automatically calculate SOFA-1, SOFA-2, APACHE II, and Sepsis-3 status for all patients. This approach ensures that the comparison between scoring systems is objective and mathematically consistent.
