Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner Versus Analog Impression in Implant Supported Rehabilitations Performed With Flapless Computer-Guided Implantology
The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of intraoral impressions obtained using the Trios 3Shape® and Carestream CS 3600™ scanners, as well as traditional analog impressions using polyvinyl siloxane (PVS), in comparison to a gold standard represented by a laboratory scanner in 51 dental models from 42 patients affected by partial edentulism who required at least two implants. Researchers compare Trios 3Shape®, Carestream CS 3600™ and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) to see if there is a different accuracy.
Age
18 - 80 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Clinica Odontoiatrica Giorgio Vogel (Università degli studi di Milano)
Milan, Italy, Italy
Start Date
July 15, 2017
Primary Completion Date
December 15, 2022
Completion Date
December 15, 2022
Last Updated
November 28, 2025
51
ACTUAL participants
impression
OTHER
Digital impression
OTHER
Lead Sponsor
University of Milan
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions