Clinical Efficacy and Patient Acceptance of Interdental Brushes and Rubber Bristles in Patients With Gingivitis

This study involved 40 systemically healthy, right-handed, non-smoking patients aged 18-35 with gingivitis and no prior experience with interdental cleaning tools. Inclusion criteria required a probing depth ≤3mm, a full-mouth bleeding on probing score ≥20%, at least 20 natural teeth, and a minimum of four evaluable interproximal sites per quadrant compatible with both test devices. Key exclusion criteria were severe gingivitis, attachment loss, systemic diseases, recent antibiotic use, and pregnancy. Participants received standardized toothpaste, a toothbrush, and training in the modified Stillman brushing technique. Following a 2-week training phase on product use and a professional prophylaxis, they refrained from interdental cleaning for 3 days to allow plaque accumulation for baseline assessments (T-QHPI for plaque, PBI for gingival bleeding). The study employed a split-mouth design. After baseline, one side of the mouth was assigned an interdental brush (IDB - TePe® Original, sizes 0.4-1.5mm) for daily use, and the contralateral side was assigned a rubber bristle interdental cleaner (RBIC - TePe EasyPick™, XS/S or M/L size). Participants were instructed on proper insertion and technique for each device. After two weeks of use, clinical indices were re-recorded by a blinded examiner. Additionally, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their satisfaction with various aspects of the products (cleaning capacity, accessibility, ease of use, overall satisfaction, willingness to reuse, and pain experienced during use).