Comparison of Body Composition Changes With Weight Loss Interventions

Patients are benefiting from landmark advancements in obesity treatments with the advent of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor agonists (GLP1RA) such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, which achieve weight loss of 15-20% in clinical trials.2,4,21 However, numerous questions surround the safety and efficacy of GLP1RAs compared to established surgical interventions. Minimally Invasive gastric bypass (GB) remains the benchmark for obesity treatments, with superior weight loss of 25-35%, and an extensive body of literature demonstrating long-term safety and efficacy, with rare complications and dramatic improvements in obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life.22,23 To date, an absence of guidelines exists to guide patients and clinicians in appropriate selection of therapies for obesity, largely resulting from the lack of head-to-head comparison for safety and efficacy of these interventions. GLP1RAs carry several risks potentially limiting their benefit. The appetite suppression induced by GLP1RAs may result in disproportionate skeletal muscle depletion, the magnitude of which remains incompletely characterized.24,25 Loss of skeletal muscle can lead to poorer functional outcomes despite weight loss, and may lead to sarcopenic obesity if weight regain occurs after drug cessation.7,10 Additionally, a majority of patients taking GLP1RAs report adverse gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms including nausea, vomiting, constipation and abdominal pain, with reported discontinuation rates of \>50% in clinical practice.26-29 Furthermore, the significant cost of GLP1RAs (averaging $10,000-15,000 annually) has placed considerable strain on healthcare systems. Recent studies suggest long-term cost benefits of GB over GLP1RAs30, but more research is needed to further delineate the most effective strategy in terms of both clinical outcomes and economic impact. This study aims to compare impact of GLP1RAs and GB on skeletal muscle composition, GI symptom profiles, and quality of life metrics. This study will also compare changes in GI symptoms and quality of life between patients undergoing laparoscopic versus robotic GB. Specific Aim 1: Compare change in appendicular lean body mass (LBM) after GLP-1 receptor agonists \& gastric bypass at 3, 6, and 12 months. Utilizing Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scans conducted prior to surgery or mediation initiation and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-intervention, the investigators will quantify the ratio of LBM loss to total weight loss with GLP1RAs and GB surgery. The investigators hypothesize that GLP1RA treatment will result in greater proportional loss of LBM than GB after 12 months of treatment. Data will be analyzed using mixed-effects models accounting for baseline characteristics and intervention type. Specific Aim 2: Compare GI symptoms changes and overall quality of life following gastric bypass vs GLP1RAs and investigate real-world tolerability of GLP1RAs. Utilizing the validated Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptoms Questionnaire (PAGI-SYM), administered at baseline and monthly intervals for 6 months, this study will compare the trajectory and severity of GI symptoms between those receiving GLP1RA and those who undergo GB. The investigators hypothesize that GLP1RA treatment will result in higher (worse) PAGI-SYM scores than GB throughout the study period. Additionally, will measure Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) monthly from intervention to 6 months post-intervention and compare trajectory of overall HRQOL after GLP1RA and GB. Specific Aim 3: Comparison of GI symptoms and quality of life changes at 3 and 6 mo with robotic surgery and GLP1RA therapies. The investigators will also study how robotic GB compares to GLP1RA therapy in terms of GI symptomatology and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL will be assessed using the validated SF-36 and the obesity-specific IWQOL-Lite instruments at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.