Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Drug-Eluting Balloon Treatment Versus Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Lipid-Rich Plaques: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether treating vulnerable plaques in the coronary arteries with a drug-coated balloon can make them less dangerous than using standard medication alone. The study includes adults with acute coronary syndrome (a type of heart problem caused by reduced blood flow in the coronary arteries). The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Does the drug-coated balloon reduce the amount of fat inside the plaque more than medication alone? * Is this treatment safe for patients? Participants will: * Undergo imaging of their coronary arteries during their planned heart procedure (PCI) * Be randomly assigned to receive either a drug-coated balloon treatment or no extra treatment * Undergo a heart scan (CT scan of the coronary arteries) within 2 weeks and again around 9 months after the procedure. * Undergo a second heart catherization 9 months later to examine changes in the plaque.
Rationale: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are often caused by rupture or erosion of certain high-risk vulnerable plaques. These plaques demonstrate specific features, such as a large lipid-rich necrotic core, a thin fibrous cap, and inflammation. Half of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation ACS have an additional vulnerable plaque, which increases their risk for non-culprit events during follow-up. Coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with the addition of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) enables the identification of coronary lesions with high lipid content, quantified using the lipid-core burden index (LCBI) and is therefore able to distinguish plaques at risk to cause future non-culprit events. In addition, computed tomography coronary angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive imaging modality that can identify high-risk plaque characteristics such as positive remodeling, low attentuation plaque, napkin-ring sign, and spotty calcification. Incorporating CCTA into this trial offers a unique opportunity to explore the potential of AI-based quantitative CT (AI-QCT) paramters by comparing them to IVUS-NIRS findings and clinical outcomes, which may support the future role of CCTA as a non-invasive tool for identifying and monitoring vulnerable plaques. The main question remains whether local and systemic treatment of such high-risk plaques decreases the risk for adverse clinical outcome. In our previous pilot study, DEBuT-LRP, we demonstrated that it was safe and feasible to treat vulnerable lipid-rich plaques with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) and that it was able to reduce the maximum LCBI on a 4 mm segment (maxLCBI4mm) after 9 months. In this randomized controlled trial, we intend to investigate the impact of DCB treatment on the maxLCBI4mm of lipid-rich plaques when compared to guideline-directed medical therapy alone. Objective: To test the hypothesis that paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment of non-obstructive non-culprit vulnerable lipid-rich plaques (LRP) leads to a greater reduction of the lipid-core burden index than guideline-directed medical therapy alone. Study design: A prospective two-arm randomized controlled trial. Study population: Patients older than 18 years with ACS who are scheduled for invasive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a native coronary artery. Intervention: DCB treatment of LRP in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Main study parameters: The main study endpoint is the difference in maxLCBI4mm reduction from baseline to 9 months follow-up compared between the two randomization groups. Secondary study endpoints are clinical safety endpoints (1. Flow-limiting dissection related to DCB-treatment necessitating bail-out stenting; 2. Periprocedural myocardial infarction; 3. Bleeding; 4. LRP lesion failure: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization related to the index LRP, 5. Patient-oriented outcome: all-cause death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization) and imaging endpoints (1. IVUS-derived parameters; 2. QCA endpoints; 3. NIRS analyses of non-treated vessels; 4. CCTA-derived parameters).
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Start Date
November 4, 2025
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2028
Completion Date
January 1, 2033
Last Updated
January 15, 2026
400
ESTIMATED participants
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
NCT03372733
NCT07241390
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT07460960