Sustained Unresponsiveness (SU) to Sesame Protein Following Low-dose Oral Allergen-specific Immunotherapy

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is currently considered the most effective treatment for food allergies. The two primary goals of food immunotherapy are desensitization and sustained unresponsiveness. Desensitization refers to the induction of temporary tolerance to the allergen, which is maintained only through regular, ongoing exposure. In contrast, the most desirable outcome-sustained unresponsiveness-is defined as the continued absence of allergic reactions to the allergen after discontinuation of immunotherapy for a specified period. This study is a long-term follow-up of participants from the randomized controlled trial (RCT) "Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Sesame Oral Immunotherapy in Pediatric Patients", NCT06261554. Patients who completed the initial phase will be invited to participate in the current phase of the project. After 8 months (+/- 3 weeks) of continued OIT with a low dose of sesame protein, patients will be admitted for hospital-based assessments including skin prick testing, laboratory evaluations, and an open oral food challenge (OFC) to assess the acquisition of desensitization to sesame protein. Patients who had a negative OFC (indicating confirmed desensitization) after 3 months of OIT during the initial phase of the study will proceed to the next part without undergoing another OFC prior to the treatment break. Only patients with confirmed desensitization, as evidenced by a negative OFC, will be eligible for the next phase. Following a 4-week interruption in OIT, these patients will be invited for another Oral Food Challenge (OFC) to assess the acquisition of sustained unresponsiveness to sesame protein. Patients with a positive OFC prior to the treatment break (i.e., those who did not achieve desensitization)-regardless of their original study group-will continue sesame OIT in accordance with the standard desensitization protocol used at the Clinic. An interim analysis is planned after 50% of participants have completed the primary outcome assessment. The analysis will be conducted by an independent Data Monitoring Committee to evaluate safety and efficacy. Appropriate alpha-spending adjustments will be applied to control for Type I error.