Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Study
Aim of the study is to analyze and compare the characteristic differences occurring in the surrounding bone in an immediate implant placed by osseodensification to immediate implants placed with the conventional technique
A bifurcation inter-radicular bone of 2 mm or more in a none restorable lower molar will be needed in order to successfully be able to drill the bone with conventional or Osseo densification burs, followed by placing the implant at this site. A xenograft bone material will be used to fill the extraction socket and a customized temporary abutment using flowable composite and a silicone mold will be fabricated and placed over it after polishing it.
Age
25 - 45 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Beirut Arab University
Beirut, Lebanon
Start Date
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion Date
December 23, 2025
Completion Date
December 23, 2025
Last Updated
July 28, 2025
24
ESTIMATED participants
Osseodensification burs
OTHER
Conventional burs
OTHER
Lead Sponsor
Mohamad Ali Itani
Collaborators
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions