This prospective, randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the effect of different preoperative patient information strategies on anxiety levels, hemodynamic responses, and pain perception during the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Third molar extraction is a common procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery, often associated with elevated patient anxiety, which can negatively affect both psychological well-being and physiological parameters such as heart rate and blood pressure.
In this study, 97 patients requiring surgical removal of a single impacted mandibular third molar were recruited and randomly assigned into one of three groups:
1. Control group - provided with a brief, basic explanation of the surgical procedure;
2. Verbal information group - provided with a detailed, non-technical verbal explanation covering the anesthesia, surgical steps, and post-operative care;
3. Visual information group - provided with the same verbal explanation plus an educational 2D animation illustrating the surgical process.
The anxiety levels of participants were measured using two validated scales: the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), both before and after surgery. Physiological measurements, including heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and oxygen saturation (SaO₂), were recorded at five standardized time points: before surgery, after information delivery and before anesthesia, after anesthesia, during tooth extraction, and in the postoperative period. Pain levels were assessed during the procedure using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
All surgeries were conducted under local anesthesia by experienced oral surgeons, following a standardized surgical protocol to minimize operator-related variability. The study also considered demographic and clinical variables, such as patient age, sex, education level, and the depth of impaction of the third molar, as potential factors influencing anxiety and physiological responses.
The study was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, and received approval from the university's ethics committee (approval number 2015/30). The primary hypothesis was that providing patients with detailed verbal or visual information would reduce preoperative anxiety compared to basic explanations, and that visual tools might offer additional benefits by enhancing patient understanding and comfort.
The results demonstrated that while anxiety scores generally decreased postoperatively across all groups, the visual (animation) information group showed significantly better oxygen saturation levels during extraction and in the postoperative period, suggesting a positive physiological impact. However, no significant differences were found between groups regarding pain scores or overall surgical duration.
These findings highlight the importance of preoperative patient education and suggest that incorporating visual educational tools, such as animations, may improve physiological stability and patient experience during oral surgical procedures. Further research is warranted to refine these strategies and explore their long-term benefits in various dental and surgical contexts.
