The Feasibility of Implementing Syphilis Point-of-care Testing Into a Prenatal Clinic for People Facing Barriers to Care

Early testing and treatment for syphilis during pregnancy, along with treating sexual partners, can prevent infection of the baby (known as congenital syphilis). However, many pregnant people at risk of syphilis also face barriers to prenatal care due to social determinants of health such as substance use and unstable housing. These barriers may lead to delays in management of syphilis in pregnancy, which may result in poor maternal and infant health outcomes. A major issue is the standard syphilis blood test. This test takes about a week to return results. This delay makes it difficult to communicate positive results to people with limited phone or internet access, and it can be hard for people to return for treatment. Additionally, it may be challenging to take blood for the syphilis test from people whose veins are damaged from intravenous drug use. As a result, syphilis diagnosis and/or treatment in pregnancy may be delayed or missed altogether. Health Canada has approved a point-of-care test for syphilis and HIV that uses a finger-prick blood sample and gives results in 5 minutes. This rapid test enables same-day syphilis treatment initiation with intramuscular penicillin antibiotic, and could overcome some of the barriers described above. However, point-of-care syphilis testing has not been studied in pregnant people facing barriers to prenatal care. An urban low-barrier prenatal clinic (Maternity Centre of Hamilton) will implement the point-of-care syphilis/HIV test as part of regular care. The test will be offered to pregnant clients at risk of syphilis, and to the sexual partners of syphilis-positive pregnant clients, given the critical importance of treating partners to prevent re-infection during pregnancy. Over 1 year, the study will evaluate the feasibility of test implementation, in terms of acceptability by clients and test performance by clinicians. The study will also preliminarily assess whether the point-of-care test improves timeliness and adequacy of treatment of syphilis-positive pregnant clients and their sexual partners. The investigators did not feel it was ethical to have a control group with delayed access to point-of-care testing given the potential harms of delayed diagnosis of syphilis in pregnancy; rather, baseline data regarding management of syphilis in pregnancy at the clinic will be established using retrospective chart review, and compared to syphilis management over the study period. Importantly, if pregnant clients or sexual partners decline study participation, they are still eligible for point-of-care testing to learn their syphilis and HIV status.