Fixed orthodontic appliances are commonly used to correct malocclusions and align teeth in orthodontic treatment. Fixed orthodontic appliances consist of several components, each serving a specific function in the orthodontic treatment process. These components typically include brackets, arch wires, ligatures (or ties), and occasionally auxiliary components such as springs or elastics. It involves the placement of orthodontic brackets, secured to the teeth surface with a composite resin material. Slots on the brackets are used to hold the orthodontic wires, which act as a means of transmitting forces to the teeth for their movement during orthodontic treatment.
The direct bonding of orthodontic devices to teeth has had a profound impact on orthodontic practices. In the early days of orthodontic treatment, brackets were attached to gold or stainless-steel bands. This process was time-consuming and uncomfortable for patients, often causing gingival trauma and decalcification. In the mid-1960s, researchers pioneered the bonding of brackets directly to enamel. Since then, there have been numerous advancements in adhesives, base designs, bracket materials, curing methods, primers, fluoride-releasing agents, and sealants. Nevertheless, the incidence and severity of white spot lesions caused by enamel decalcification are increasing among those receiving orthodontic treatment. Surprisingly, these lesions can appear as early as one month after the placement of orthodontic brackets. Prolonged treatment, lasting over a year, increases this risk due to the presence of fixed appliances, creating areas for plaque accumulation. This plaque may rapidly modify the composition of bacteria, particularly acid-producing bacteria, leading to enamel erosion and the formation of white spot lesions (WSLs).
White spot lesions are rapidly forming, prompting clinicians to explore solutions for orthodontic-associated demineralization. Factors such as food debris, diet, fluoride availability, mineral crystal composition, and salivary content can influence demineralization periods. Studies have shown that preventive strategies, such as application of topical fluorides, reduce the incidence of WSLs formation. A systematic review has demonstrated the effectiveness of topical sodium fluoride varnishes (FV) in preventing enamel decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. However, the reported preventive fraction is wide, ranging from 12 to 55%. This shows that the preventive effects of FV are not consistent and vary between individuals. The range of results seen may also be attributed to the bioavailability of fluoride in saliva, which is regulated by variables including salivary secretion rate, dietary fluoride consumption, and the usage of fluoridated products. While traditional fluorides like sodium fluoride support remineralization following topical application, they exhibit shorter persistence in saliva compared to SDF's 38% retention. This is due to the stable silver halide compound that forms in saliva, which helps sustain SDF over an extended period of time, and the high fluoride content of SDF, which renders it a great potential for remineralization. Further, the remineralisation and antibacterial effects of fluoride are slow and highly dependent on factors such as patients brushing efficacy and the stability of the fluoride ion in the saliva. This might explain why the WSLs are still occur and present around the orthodontic brackets even though the preventive measures have been implemented.
Recently, the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has gained much attention in caries management strategy, especially on cavitated lesions. SDF was introduced into the dental field by Nishiino, Yamaga and their colleagues in the 1960s available at 38% concentration. SDF is a colourless and odorless solution which consists of silver, fluoride, and ammonia ion. The presence of the silver component in the SDF formulation helps in stimulating dentine sclerosis and provides antibacterial activity by causing immediate bacterial death through inhibition of bacterial DNA replication and blocking the formation of proteolytic enzymes. Fluoride on the other hand act as a remineralising agent and presents at a high concentration of 44,800 ppm.
The combined effects of remineralising and antibacterial properties make SDF an effective cariostatic agent. A systematic review showed that SDF effectively arrests decay in primary teeth in children, with a proportion of 66%-81% with annual or biannual application, while it was reported that the preventive fraction of SDF is as high as 61% and 72%, respectively. In comparison to fluoride varnish, SDF has a better caries arrest ability on both primary and permanent teeth, where the effectiveness is almost doubled than the effects of sodium fluoride varnish at 30 months.
The only drawback of SDF application is the formation of black staining on the cavitated lesion due to the formation of silver phosphate precipitate when hydroxyapatite crystals react with the SDF solution. However, the addition of potassium iodide managed to reduce the staining effects, leading to a yellow-brown rather than a black discoloration. In addition, SDF will not stain sound enamel suggesting its promising role in the prevention of dental caries.
However, based on our knowledge, the effects of SDF in preventing WSLs formation in patients with fixed orthodontics has not been established yet. Therefore, the investigators would like to take this opportunity and conduct a clinical trial with the aim to investigate the effectiveness of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) in caries prevention among patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.
