Clinical Outcomes of Sutured Versus Sutureless Conjunctival Autograft in Primary Pterygium Excision

This study is a comparative interventional study, in which patients are assigned into two groups comparable in age, gender, and general condition. The first group consists of patients with primary pterygium who will undergo surgery in a traditional approach in which the pterygium is surgically removed and after which a conjuctival graft is placed on the exposed sclera and sutured to the surrounding conjuctiva; in comparison, patients of the second group undergo pterygium excision in a similar matter initially.But the conjuctival graft is placed on the exposed sclera without suturing it to the nearby conjuctiva; instead, the graft remains in place using the patient's autologous blood. Fresh blood is left under the graft, while the surgeon merely compresses the graft for a few minutes. The aim of this study is to reach a conclusion as to which technique is more beneficial, to the patient and surgeon. Patients included in this study must have primary pterygium, no known hematological condition, and full consent to the study. Surgery time is recorded to compare the effect of avoiding sutures on the surgeon's speed. After that, Patients are followed up in documented certain intervals post-operative, to assess graft displacement, signs of inflammation, signs of bleeding under graft, and patients' overall discomfort and satisfaction. Finally, the two groups are compared with all factors taken into consideration. The ultimate target is to document evidence of the efficiency of the sutureless technique and endorse its application by Ophthalmologists elsewhere.