Does the Use of Patient Specific Instrumentation Improve Outcomes in Knee Arthroplasty Surgery for Osteoarthritis When Compared to Standard Posterior Referenced Instrumentation?
Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Keep this study
Lead
Vastra Gotaland Region
With
Zimmer Biomet
Ingabritt och Arne Lundbergs Forskningsstiftelse
Age
40–75
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
You may be eligible if
Medial or lateral primary osteoarthritis (OA) Ahlbäck Grade 2-4
Varus or valgus deformity ≤10 degrees, extension defect ≤10 degrees
Age 40-75 years
BMI \<35
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-3.
Coming from independent living in own home
Able and willing to undergo MRI scan (for custom patients), full-leg standing radiographs and follow up with RSA
Written informed consent.
You may not be if
Cortisone treatment during the last 6 months before operation
Neurological diseases with symptoms, stroke with sequel
Endocrine diseases with symptoms
OA secondary to trauma, infection, inflammatory disease or congenital and acquired deformities
BMI \>=35
OA of the hip with symptoms
Ongoing infection
Any metal within 150 mm from the joint line on the side to become operated
Unable or unwilling to participate in the follow-up.
Clareo Health | Does the Use of Patient Specific Instrumentation Improve Outcomes in Knee Arthroplasty Surgery for Osteoarthritis When Compared to Standard Posterior Referenced Instrumentation?
