Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
This clinical trial tests the effect of induction chemotherapy response-guided radiation (de-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy \[IMRT\]) compared to standard IMRT in patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated nasopharyngeal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an advanced form of 3-dimensional radiation therapy that uses computer-generated images to show the size and shape of the tumor. Thin beams of radiation of different intensities are aimed at the tumor from many angles. This type of radiation therapy reduces the damage to healthy tissue near the tumor. Radiation therapy sometimes causes unwanted symptoms or side effects, including late effects such as hearing loss and dental problems. The severity of the side effects is related to the radiation dose received and the amount of tissue that received radiation. De-escalation IMRT uses lower doses of radiation based on a good response to induction chemotherapy. Giving de-escalated IMRT may be as effective as standard doses of IMRT in treating patients with EBV-associated nasopharyngeal cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To measure the proportion of participants alive without progression of disease two years following induction therapy (IT) response-guided IMRT. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the 1-year rate of progression-free survival (PFS) after IT response-guided IMRT. II. To assess the 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after IT response-guided IMRT. III. To assess the 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of distant metastasis (DM) after IT response-guided IMRT. IV. To assess the 1- and 2-year rates of overall survival (OS) after IT response-guided IMRT. V. To compare the rates of severe acute toxicities between standard and de-escalated IMRT. VI. To compare the rates of severe late toxicities between standard and response-guided IMRT over a period of 2 years. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the frequency of radiation treatment breaks between standard and de-escalated IMRT. II. To compare the frequency of hospitalizations between standard and de-escalated IMRT. III. To compare pre-treatment and short- and long-term post-treatment quality of life (QoL) after standard versus de-escalated IMRT. IV. To compare pre-treatment and short- and long-term post-treatment levels of fatigue after standard versus de-escalated IMRT. V. To compare radiation dosimetric parameters between standard and de-escalated IMRT. VI. To explore differences in efficacy endpoints by sex, age, English language status, and race/ethnicity. VII. To explore heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTEs) of efficacy endpoints by variables, such as sex, age, English language status, and race/ethnicity. VIII. To explore the association between EBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels and disease response on imaging upon completion of IT. IX. To explore longitudinal EBV DNA levels after completion of IT response-guided IMRT. X. To compare the rates of severe very late toxicities (from years 2 to 10 after completion of IMRT) between standard and response-guided IMRT. XI. To explore the association between adjuvant (post-chemoradiation) systemic therapy use and oncologic outcomes (PFS, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival), quality of life, and fatigue. XII. To assess frequency of intra-treatment tumor hypoxia in participants undergoing standard and de-escalated radiotherapy. XII. To explore the association between the presence of intra-treatment tumor hypoxia and baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. XIV. To explore the association between the presence of intra-treatment tumor hypoxia and oncologic outcomes, toxicity, quality of life, and fatigue. XV. To evaluate the relationship between intra-treatment tumor hypoxia and pre-treatment EBV DNA levels. XVI. To evaluate the relationship between intra-treatment tumor hypoxia and end-of-treatment EBV DNA levels. OUTLINE: Patients with partial radiographic response to IT in the primary tumor and lymph nodes are assigned to Arm I. Patients with stable or progressive disease are assigned to Arm II. ARM I (DE-ESCALATED INTENSITY): Patients undergo de-escalated IMRT once daily (QD) 5 days a week for up to 7 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), PET/CT, CT, and/or bone scans throughout the trial ARM II (STANDARD): Patients undergo standard IMRT QD on 5 days a week for up to 7 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT/MRI, PET, PET/CT, CT, and/or bone scans throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3 months then every 6 months for up to 10 years.
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Start Date
March 18, 2025
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2029
Completion Date
March 31, 2032
Last Updated
April 20, 2025
66
ESTIMATED participants
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
RADIATION
Radiographic Imaging
PROCEDURE
Biospecimen Collection
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
NCT06980038
NCT06059261
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06636734