Evaluating an rhPDGF-BB-enhanced Collagen Plug for Perianal Fistula Healing

Perianal fistula is a common colorectal condition with an incidence of 9 cases per 100,000. Most perianal fistulas originate from an anal abscess that does not heal properly and are mainly treated with surgical interventions. The type of surgery and healing rates depend on the classification of the fistula as simple or complex and the proportion of the sphincter muscle that is involved. The second most common cause of perianal fistula is due to Crohn's disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory disease with an estimated annual incidence of 3 to 20 cases per 100,000. Approximately 20% of patients with CD will develop a perianal fistula within 10 years of diagnosis. CD-related perianal fistulas are a severe complication of chronic intestinal inflammation and rely on the combination of pharmacological therapies and surgical interventions, but still one-third of CD-related fistulas remain unhealed. This Phase II clinical trial will evaluate the performance, preliminary safety and efficacy, and feasibility of the rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug versus routine care on healing complex perianal fistulas that are not eligible for a fistulotomy. This prospective, blinded, single-site study will randomize participants, 2:1 intervention versus control, into two arms comparing the rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug to routine care procedures and stratify participants by fistula etiology, Crohn's or idiopathic. Routine care includes draining seton removal and natural healing for Crohn's fistulas or COOK Biotech's Biodesign® Anal Fistula Plug implant for idiopathic fistulas. For both non-CD (idiopathic) and CD-related fistulas, a loose seton is an effective first-line treatment to facilitate drainage of the abscess, prevent the recurrence of an abscess, and increase the chance of healing successfully. After seton placement, the therapeutic interventions for idiopathic and CD-related fistulas differ, and the overall healing rates are widely variable in the literature. The outcomes for CD-related perianal fistulas with seton intervention report success rates between 14-81% and idiopathic perianal fistulas with anal fistula plug intervention are highly similar with success rates between 15.8-72.7%. After recruiting and consenting, participants will be randomized and scheduled for the baseline procedure. Randomization blocks of size 3 (2:1 intervention to control) within each stratum (idiopathic versus CD-related) will be utilized, and the patient will be blinded. The investigator will not be blinded because the control and intervention procedures are different. Following the baseline procedure, participants will return for outcomes assessment by a blinded physician at one month, three months, and six months and complete a weekly participant survey from home. At each study visit, the blinded physician will perform a clinical examination of the external opening to assess for inflammation, drainage, and epithelialization, take clinical photographs, and discuss any adverse events (1-month and 3-month visits only). At the 3-month study visit, the blinded physician will determine if the fistula has completely healed, and this will be documented in the study database. At the 6-month final study visit, the blinded physician will assess for recurrence of the fistula by examination of the external opening, and this will be documented in the study database. If the fistula is not healing at the 3-month study visit and the participant is in the control arm of the study, they will reach their endpoint as a control and have the option to crossover to the investigational arm and receive the investigational intervention. These participants will first have another draining seton placed in their fistula tract for approximately 3 weeks and be scheduled for the intervention procedure, implantation of the rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug. This group will restart at visit 2 for the procedure and return for all post-procedural study visits 3-5 at 1-, 3-, and 6-months. Their outcome measures will be tracked and documented, and they will complete the weekly participant surveys, but their results will not be included in the initial analyses of the original randomized participant data. This will be considered extended open-label use of the investigational intervention and will not delay reporting the outcomes from the comparison of healing between the original intervention and control groups at 3 months. Their outcome measures will be analyzed and reported separately. The natural history and actual case-counts of these two patient populations, idiopathic and CD-related complex perianal fistulas, guided the design of the objectives, outcomes, and sample size that would allow this pilot study to be completed in approximately 15 months. A small, 2:1 randomized, parallel arm design was chosen for the purposes of evaluating preliminary performance, safety, efficacy, and feasibility. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the technical performance of the rhPDGF-BB-enhanced collagen plug for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas regardless of etiology. This outcome measure is defined as procedural success of the rhPDGF-enhanced collagen plug without any intervention-related serious adverse events. Procedural complications include but are not limited to acute infection, dislodgement or extrusion of the plug, and non-healing of the fistula tract. The secondary objectives that are focused on the potential efficacy of this treatment will include a stratified subgroup analyses for idiopathic and CD-related fistulas due to the differences in natural history and potential differences in outcomes with routine care in these two groups. Further, the stratified, randomized design will promote balance of the etiologies across the trial arms. For this pilot, published data and the investigator's real-world experience with healing in these patients were used to design the objectives and outcomes that will guide a larger more definitive follow-up trial where assessing efficacy may or may not include both etiologies. Given the number of different perianal fistula types, anatomical presentations, and approaches to treatment, the inclusion criteria are specific to fistulas that are a single continuous tract, have had a draining seton placed, and are not amenable to fistulotomy regardless of etiology. The study design, control groups, and inclusion criteria support the endpoint analyses at 1-, 3-, and 6-months post intervention based on historical data for healing, remission, and recurrence of perianal fistulas.