LA Function and Dimensions As Predictors of Disease Activity in RA

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic progressive disease associated with systemic inflammation that affects mainly synovial joints leading to tissue destruction, disability and excess mortality (1). With a prevalence ranging from 0.4% to 1.3% of the population depending on both sex (women are affected two to three times more often than men), age (frequency of new RA diagnoses peaks in the sixth decade of life (2). RA has extra-articular manifestations that can impact multiple organ systems (3). RA patients remain at higher cardiovascular risk compared to non-RA patients(4).Cardiovascular manifestations of RA include accelerated atherosclerosis, heart failure, pericarditis, myocarditis, endocarditis, rheumatoid nodules, and amyloidosis. Inflammation is an important mediator of endothelial dysfunction and is a key driver of cardiovascular risk and complications in patients with RA (3). The increased prevalence of atherosclerosis in RA seems to be associated with excess inflammatory burden and requires tailored screening strategies and management (1). Heart structural abnormalities are more prevalent in RA-patients than in general population, such as pericarditis, increased left ventricle mass and valvular disease (5). Left atrial (LA) dilation predicts atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure. It also increases the risk of developing thromboembolic events(6). Echocardiography, including transthoracic two and three-dimensional echocardiography, Doppler imaging, myocardial deformation and transesophageal echo, is an established and widely available imaging technique for the identification of cardiovascular manifestations that are crucial for prognosis in rheumatic diseases. Echocardiography is also important for monitoring the impact of drug treatment on cardiac function, coronary microcirculatory function, valvular function and pulmonary artery pressures (7). Left atrial volume index (LAVI), measured by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography, is an accurate descriptor of LA volume, and is recommended in the latest guidelines for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (8). At present, most previous studies focus solely on detecting the associations between baseline LAVI and clinical outcomes, with few attentions paid to the prognostic value of LAVI alteration for HFpEF. Clinically, RA patients typically present with a recent onset of tender and swollen joints, morning joint stiffness, generalized sickness symptoms, as well as abnormal laboratory tests (2). The 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) is a widely used measure to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The DAS28-P index, a derived proportion of the patient-reported components (joint tenderness and patient global assessment) within the DAS28, has been utilized as a discriminatory measure of non-inflammatory pain mechanisms in RA (9). Both ultrasound and MRI have been recommended for diagnosing and monitoring disease activity in RA patients (10). Musculoskeletal ultrasound is widely used to identify structural change and assess therapeutic response in RA Ultrasound analysis (e.g., as high-resolution musculoskeletal ultrasound) of inflamed joints allows imaging of synovial proliferation by grayscale as well as both active inflammation and neoangiogenesis by power Doppler. In addition, ultrasound can identify bone erosions (11), as well as subclinical synovitis that may result in radiographic disease progression even if the patient is in apparent clinical remission (12).Due to these capabilities, ultrasound is widely used in clinical practice as well as in clinical trials for the diagnosis of RA and the monitoring of disease states (13).The advantages of ultrasound are its relatively low cost, wide availability, lack of contraindications, and non-invasive real-time imaging capabilities. Disadvantages are that ultrasound is considered an operator-dependent technology because of it being training-intensive in terms of both measurement and quality assessment (12). While being a very sensitive diagnostic tool to detect e.g., synovial hypertrophy or pannus formation before the occurrence of bone erosion, routine usage of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques (preferably contrasted) in the diagnosis of RA is limited by cost factors and the limited capacity to image multiple joints in one measurement (2). In our study, we will evaluate the LA function and dimensions, parallel to the evaluation of disease activity in RA patients, to detect possible association between disease activity and subclinical LA affection. Sample size was calculated using epi info program. the following parameters were applied for observational cross sectional study. Population size 150 seek care at Assiut university hospital, proportion of left ventricular dysfunction among RA patients 59% (5) , design effect 1, and 95% confidence interval. The minimum estimated Sample size was 108 RA patients. All participants will be subjected to the following: history taking and clinical examination, including Patients' data will be collected, included age at diagnosis, gender, residence, occupation, smoking and comorbidities, and duration , symptoms and signs of RA activity within the last 7 days. If articular activity is present, disease activity score-28 (DAS-28) will be calculated based on the number of swollen or tender joint count and will be applied to establish RA activity Patients will be subjected to transthoracic echocardiography including, the following parameters will be measured: * Left ventricular (LV) dimensions: end diastolic and systolic dimensions and LV ejection fraction (EF). * Trans- mitral Doppler flow velocities including early (E) and late(A) diastolic velocities, E/A ratio. * LA anteroposterior diameter measure from 2D parasternal long axis view targeted M-mode. * LA superior-inferior and medio-lateral diameters measure from the apical 4 chamber view. * LA volume included: * Maximal LA volume measure at the end of systole just before mitral valve opening at the end of the T wave on ECG. Maximal LA volume is delivered from semi-automated tracing of the LA endometrium, starting the measurements in the frame with the largest atrial dimensions ,corresponding to ventricular end systole, just before the opening of the atrio-ventricular valves, in perpendicular apical long axis planes. * Minimal LA volume will be measured at end diastole just at the closure of the mitral valve. * Pre contractile LA volume ( LAV pre-A\] measured at P-wave onset on ECG just before atrial contraction. LA volume index (LAVI) will be obtained as the following: LA maximal volume will be obtained from apical four-chamber and two-chamber views at end-systole through the modified Simpson disc method, and then normalized to body surface area (BSA) to derive LAVI. This will be assessed according to ASE guidelines then the patients according to the measures will be into four different levels: normal (≤34 ml/m2), mild dysfunction (34-41 ml/m2), moderate dysfunction (42-48 ml/m2), and severe dysfunction (\>48 ml/m2). Laboratory investigations will be obtained * Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). * C reactive protein (CRP). * Complete blood count (CBC). * Lipid profile test * Musculoskeletal ultrasonography will be done: Ultrasound detected synovitis to be correlated with cardiac function. * X ray of Hands will be done. * Electrocardiogram (ECG) will be done. 2.4.1- Type of the study: Observational cross-sectional study 2.4. 2- Study Setting: rheumatology unit, Internal Medicine Department at Assiut University Hospitals. 2.4. 3- Study subjects: 1. Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with RA (aged \>18 years and duration of RA disease \>1 year) come to the rheumatology/ Internal medicine department or outpatient clinics at Assiut University Hospital. 2. RA are diagnosed based on the ACR/EULAR 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria if a total score of ≥6 is needed to classify a patient as having definite RA. 2. Exclusion criteria: 1- Patients with known history of atherosclerotic heart disease. 2- Patients with overlap syndrome. 3- Patients with hypothyroidism, Cushing's syndrome, anemia, and severe hepatic or renal dysfunction 3. Sample size Calculation: sample size was calculated using epi info program. the following parameters were applied for observational cross sectional study. Population size 150 seek care at Assiut university hospital, proportion of left ventricular dysfunction among RA patients 59% (5) , design effect 1, and 95% confidence interval. The minimum estimated Sample size was 108 RA patients. 2.4.4 -Study tools (in detail, e.g., lab methods, instruments, steps, chemicals, …): A-History taking 1. All participants will be subjected to the following: history taking and clinical examination, including Patients' data will be collected, included age at diagnosis, gender, residence, occupation, smoking and comorbidities, and duration , symptoms and signs of RA activity within the last 7 days. If articular activity is present, disease activity score-28 (DAS-28) will be calculated based on the number of swollen or tender joint count and will be applied to establish RA activity , 2. Type of treatment received, emphasizing current and former medications, B- Laboratory investigations • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). • C reactive protein (CRP). • Complete blood count (CBC). • Lipid profile test. C- Other investigation: \- Echocardiographic examination: Patients will be subjected to transthoracic echocardiography including, the following parameters will be measured: • Left ventricular (LV) dimensions: end diastolic and systolic dimensions and LV ejection fraction (EF). • Trans- mitral Doppler flow velocities including early (E) and late(A) diastolic velocities, E/A ratio. • LA anteroposterior diameter measure from 2D parasternal long axis view targeted M-mode. • LA superior-inferior and medio-lateral diameters measure from the apical 4 chamber view. • LA volume included: • Maximal LA volume measure at the end of systole just before mitral valve opening at the end of the T wave on ECG. Maximal LA volume is delivered from semi-automated tracing of the LA endometrium, starting the measurements in the frame with the largest atrial dimensions ,corresponding to ventricular end systole, just before the opening of the atrio-ventricular valves, in perpendicular apical long axis planes. * Minimal LA volume will be measured at end diastole just at the closure of the mitral valve. * Pre contractile LA volume ( LAV pre-A\] measured at P-wave onset on ECG just before atrial contraction. LA volume index (LAVI) will be obtained as the following: LA maximal volume will be obtained from apical four-chamber and two-chamber views at end-systole through the modified Simpson disc method, and then normalized to body surface area (BSA) to derive LAVI. This will be assessed according to ASE guidelines then the patients according to the measures will be into four different levels: normal (≤34 ml/m2), mild dysfunction (34-41 ml/m2), moderate dysfunction (42-48 ml/m2), and severe dysfunction (\>48 ml/m2). \- Musculoskeletal ultrasonography : Ultrasound detected synovitis to be correlated with cardiac function. \- X ray of Hands. \- Electrocardiogram (ECG). 2.4.5 -Research outcome measures: Primary (main): • Detect echocardiographic abnormalities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. * Detect subclinical echocardiographic changes of the LA (dimensions and function) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.. * Evaluate the correlation between Rheumatoid arthritis and increased heart failure risk.. Secondary outcome (Subsidiary) : * Describe concurrent systemic comorbidities, rheumatologic clinical activity, serologic markers of rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory activity. * Evaluation of the LA function and dimensions, parallel to the evaluation of disease activity in RA patients, to detect possible association between disease activity and subclinical LA affection. Data management and analysis: Data collection: The collected data will be revised, coded, tabulated and introduced to a PC. Computer software IBM\_SPSS. Statistical Package for Social Science. Ver.21. Standard version. Copyright © SPSS Inc., 2011-2012. NY, USA. 2012. Statistical tests Data will be presented, and suitable analysis will be done according to the type of data obtained for each parameter. i.Descriptive statistics: 1.Description of qualitative variables is done by frequency and percentage. 2.Description of quantitative variables is in the form of mean and SD. ii.Analytic statistics: 1. χ2-test and Fisher's exact test are used for comparison of qualitative variables with each other. 2. Comparison between quantitative variables is carried out using Student's t-test of two independent samples. 3. For comparison of more than two quantitative groups, analysis of variance F-test is used for categorical data. 4. Significance level (P) is expressed as follows: P value greater than 0.05 is not significant, P value less than 0.05 is significant, and P value less than 0.001 is highly significant. 5. Pearson's correlation coefficient is used to calculate the correlation between quantitative variables. Spearman's coefficient is calculated to determine the relationships between non parametric quantitative variables