Finding studies
Finding studies
Take this into the appointment.
Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Lead
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between the therapy of physician choice (TPC) arm and the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the progression free survival (PFS) between the TPC arm and the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm. II. To evaluate overall response rate (ORR) between the TPC arm and the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm. III. To evaluate clinical benefit rate (complete response \[CR\]/partial response \[PR\] /stable disease \[SD\]) between the TPC arm and the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm. IV. To evaluate duration of response (DoR) between the TPC arm and the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm. V. To evaluate toxicity of the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). EXPLORATORY HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQOL) OBJECTIVES: I. To compare HRQOL, as assessed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18 (FBISI-18) summary score between patients on the TPC arm versus the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm at 6 months. II. To compare HRQOL change from baseline, as assessed by the FBISI-18 summary score, for patients on the TPC arm versus the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. III. To compare the change in patient-reported fatigue from baseline and across 3, 6, and 12 months as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) summary score; change from baseline will be compared between patients on the TPC arm versus the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm. IV. To compare quality-adjusted survival (overall survival x health utility score assessed by the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level \[EQ-5D-5L\]) between patients on the TPC arm versus the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm. V. To compare time to HRQOL deterioration in global HRQOL, as measured by the FBISI-18 disease-related physical symptom subscale (FBISI-18 disease-related symptoms (DRS) in the physical emotional domains \[DRS-P\]), between patients on the TPC arm versus the Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy + pembrolizumab arm. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive TPC with carboplatin or cisplatin intravenously (IV) on day 1 and gemcitabine IV on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may alternately receive TPC with docetaxel IV on day 1 of each cycle or paclitaxel IV on either day 1 or days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients additionally undergo blood sample collection and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study. ARM B: Patients receive sacituzumab govitecan-hziy IV over 1-3 hours on days 1 and 8 and pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for up to 35 cycles or for 2 years of pembrolizumab in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Cycles of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy repeats every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients additionally undergo blood sample collection, and CT or MRI throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days then once a year for 5 years from the date of randomization.
Age
18–any
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
