Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
The goal of this diagnostic randomised clinical trial is to determine, in glioblastoma patients with diagnostic uncertainty between pseudoprogression and tumor progression on follow-up MRI after chemoradiation, the added value of a direct \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET scan for clinical management. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the clinical management guided by an additional FET-PET scan leads to fewer unnecessary interventions, compared with management based on MRI only? * Does the clinical management guided by an additional FET-PET scan leads to better health-related quality of life after 12 weeks, compared with management based on MRI only? * Does the clinical management guided by an additional FET-PET scan leads to reduced net healthcare costs, compared with management based on MRI only? Researchers will compare the investigational arm, where clinical management is based on the index MRI scan and an additional FET-PET scan, with the control arm, where clinical management is based solely on the index MRI scan, to investigate the added value of the FET PET scan for clinical management. Participants in the investigational arm will undergo the FET PET scan. All participants will complete health-related quality of life questionnaires at four different timepoints.
During follow-up of glioblastoma patients after chemoradiation, expert teams often observe MRI abnormalities with difficulty in distinguishing between tumor growth and pseudoprogression. Although techniques such as perfusion MRI provide additional information, diagnostic uncertainty often remains, leading to incorrect or delayed diagnosis and, inappropriate treatment, such as unnecessary surgery. Despite the good discriminating power of \[¹⁸F\] Fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine-PET (FET-PET), this diagnostic tool is not used frequently in the Netherlands due to costs, logistics, and misconceptions about clinical benefit. In the FET POPPING study we aim to determine the added value of \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET for clinical management. A multicenter diagnostic randomised clinical trial will be performed, from July 2024 until December 2027. 144 adult patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma will be included, who, after the concomitant phase of chemoradiation, have increased contrast enhancement on MRI, causing doubt between tumor growth or pseudoprogression. Included patients will be randomised 1:1 in two arms. The investigational arm receives an additional \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET scan, and clinical management is based on the index MRI and \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET together. Clinical management of the control arm is based on the index MRI alone. Exact clinical management, following from the available imaging, is chosen at the discretion of a multidisciplinary board. The primary study endpoints are (a) the percentage of patients undergoing unnecessary interventions and (b) health-related quality of life after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints include time-to-diagnosis, overall survival and cost-effectiveness. We hypothesize that the clinical management guided by an additional \[¹⁸F\] FET-PET scan leads to fewer unnecessary interventions, better health-related quality of life after 12 weeks and among others reduced net healthcare costs, compared with management based on MRI only.
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Netherlands
UMC Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Maastricht UMC
Maastricht, Netherlands
Radboud UMC
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Haaglanden MC
The Hague, Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
Start Date
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2027
Completion Date
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 28, 2024
144
ESTIMATED participants
Clinical management based on the index MRI and an additional [¹⁸F] FET PET scan
OTHER
Lead Sponsor
Veerle Ruijters
Collaborators
NCT00083512
NCT06860594
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT05839379