Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
A Prospective, Blinded, Randomised Clinical Trial of Fludrocortisone Compared With Placebo in Critically Ill Patients Presenting With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
A multi-centre, prospective, blinded, randomised clinical trial of fludrocortisone compared with placebo in patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. The study aim is to determine if early administration of enteral fludrocortisone in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage reduce death and dependency at six months.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH)is a devastating form of stroke, that predominately affects a younger age group. There are approximately 2000 cases per year in Australia, with the majority occurring in patients between 45 and 64 years of age and with a significant female preponderance. The burden of mortality of this condition is high; a review of 11,327 cases from 2000 to 2015 by our group revealed a mortality rate of 29% in patients who survived to hospital admission, with no annual improvement in that rate from 2003 onwards. Moreover, a substantial proportion of survivors from aSAH are left with residual neurological deficits. Persistent neurocognitive changes including deficits in memory, executive functioning and language, fatigue, depression and post-traumatic stress have been reported in survivors, resulting in lower than normal health related quality of life (HRQoL). Cognitive impairment persists even in patients with supposedly good neurological recovery, with up to 40% of patients unable to return to their previous occupation. Data from our group support these findings, suggesting that approximately 50% of patients report at least a moderate disability six months after hospital discharge. The healthcare costs associated with aSAH are substantial. In Australia and New Zealand, most patients with aSAH are admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and have a median length of stay of 9 and 20 days in ICU and hospital, respectively. The median hospital cost for managing a patient with high grade aSAH is A$41,824 (interquartile range A$9,933-A$97,332); without considering the need for rehabilitation, ongoing care, and loss of earnings. Data from a single centre estimated total hospital costs over a ten year period for this cohort at $8.3 million; only 52 patients out of 139 survived hospitalisation. In contrast, a 14 day course of fludrocortisone costs just over A$12 compared with A$4800 for an occupied ICU bed day. A low cost intervention which reduced ICU stay and improved outcomes would therefore be anticipated to have a substantial economic benefit. There are a number of complications associated with aSAH, of which hyponatraemia (defined as a serum sodium concentration \<135mmol/L) is one of the most common with a reported prevalence of between 35% to 77%.7,8 The primary cause appears to be a salt wasting syndrome caused by secretion of natriuretic peptides and associated with large urine outputs and hypovolaemia. Hyponatraemia in the setting of aSAH is of particular concern, as it may exacerbate cerebral oedema and is also associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular vasospasm and cerebral infarction, as well as a longer duration of ICU admission. Our group has recently completed a prospective analysis of 356 patients with aSAH from Australia and New Zealand and demonstrated that patients in whom the sodium concentration decreases over the ICU stay have a higher likelihood of a worse neurological outcome at 6-months compared to those patients in whom the sodium concentration remains steady. Management of hyponatraemia in aSAH is complicated by the need to maintain a neutral fluid balance, as a reduced circulating blood volume is associated with an increased risk of cerebral vasospasm and delayed neurological deficit. Standard treatment comprises IV volume resuscitation and use of hypertonic saline solutions. These interventions require frequent blood tests, strict attention to fluid balance and central venous access, which can only be provided in ICU or high dependency units. Fludrocortisone is a synthetic adrenocortical steroid possessing potent mineralocorticoid activity. In standard doses it produces significant sodium and fluid retention and increases urinary potassium excretion. It is currently only approved by the Therapeutic Goods Association for treatment of Addison's disease and salt losing adrenogenital syndrome and is priced at 20c per dose (100µg tablet). There are two previous randomised trials which have examined the effect of fludrocortisone treatment on hyponatraemia and sodium balance in aSAH. Mori et al randomised 30 patients with aSAH and demonstrated that fludrocortisone significantly reduced urinary sodium excretion and reduced the incidence of hyponatraemia compared to standard management. Similar findings were noted in a study of 91 aSAH patients by Hasan et al, who also reported a lower incidence of cerebral ischaemia in the group that received fludrocortisone compared to standard treatment (22% vs 31% respectively, p=0.3). The trials were not blinded, and hyponatraemia was not an inclusion criterion. A more recent trial in the treatment of cerebral salt wasting secondary to tuberculous meningitis demonstrated that patients receiving fludrocortisone corrected their serum sodium concentration significantly faster than those who received placebo (4 days vs 15 days; p=0.004), and had a significantly lower incidence of deep border zone cerebral infarction (6% vs 33%, p=0.04). Two systematic reviews have examined the role of fludrocortisone in preventing hyponatraemia and improving outcomes in aSAH. A Cochrane review published in 2005 identified the two previous trials of fludrocortisone in aSAH described above, both of which were performed over twenty years ago. A study using hydrocortisone (which also has mineralocorticoid action) was also included in the analysis. Mineralocorticoid treatment with fludrocortisone was reported to reduce the relative risk of delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI); (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.33-1.27) and of poor outcome; (RR 0.33;95% CI 0.03-3.20). A pooled estimate demonstrated that these treatments were associated with an increased rate of adverse effects; (RR 1.75;95% CI 1.03-2.95). However, this finding appeared to be generated mainly by the increased rate of hyperglycaemia in the hydrocortisone trial, whereas the two trials of fludrocortisone reported no increase in adverse effects. The authors concluded that participant numbers were too small to draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy of fludrocortisone and that further randomised controlled trials were required. The second systematic review published in 2017 identified only one additional study of fludrocortisone to those in the 2005 analysis; this was however a before and after observational study, not a clinical trial. The authors identified that fludrocortisone treatment led to a reduction in hyponatremia, natriuresis and circulating volume contraction. There was no statistically significant effect of mineralocorticoid treatment on symptomatic vasospasm or DCI (RR 0.6; 95% CI 0.35-1.03), although the 95% CI were in favour of clinical benefit (Figure 2). The authors concluded the current evidence was not sufficient to determine the effect of fludrocortisone treatment because the included studies were underpowered, and that larger randomised trials were warranted. The Neurocritical Care Society treatment guidelines for aSAH comment that fludrocortisone may be used for treatment of hyponatremia and/or hypovolaemia, but make no recommendation for its use in prevention. It appears to be safe and well tolerated - anticipated adverse effects include hypokalaemia, hypertension and pulmonary oedema, but these appear to be rare. Mori et al reported an increased incidence of transient hypokalaemia. Hasan et al noted 4 episodes of pulmonary oedema - 2 each in the fludrocortisone and control groups. Although some clinical guidelines have suggested fludrocortisone as a potential treatment for hyponatremia in aSAH, it is not widely used; our observational data from Australasian ICUs has shown that less than 10% of the patient cohort were prescribed fludrocortisone. Of note, these patients had better functional outcomes at six months. The likely reason for the lack of widespread adoption into clinical practice is that the trials by Mori and Hasan discussed above were small, unblinded, and published over twenty years ago. Not only has management of aSAH substantially changed in that time period, but neither trial was sufficiently powered to detect improvements in patient centred outcomes. The authors of the most recent meta-analysis concluded that the existing data did not reflect current practice, the trials were small, and so large prospective RCTs were required to confirm these findings. Recent reviews have highlighted that fludrocortisone may be a useful adjunct in the treatment and prevention of hyponatremia in aSAH, but that the current evidence is insufficient to make treatment recommendations. Fludrocortisone therefore has the potential to prevent the onset of hyponatraemia in aSAH and lead to improved outcomes; this will be the first adequately designed trial to test this hypothesis.
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
John Hunter Hospital
New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
Nepean Hospital
Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
Prince of Wales Hospital
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Royal Brisbane Women's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Gold Coast University Hospital
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Townsville Hospital
Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Start Date
August 13, 2025
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2029
Completion Date
July 31, 2030
Last Updated
December 16, 2025
524
ESTIMATED participants
Fludrocortisone
DRUG
Placebo
DRUG
Lead Sponsor
The George Institute
NCT07160088
NCT04566991
NCT04507178
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions