Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation for Major Depression: an Intensity-response Study

Introduction: Key issues and knowledge gaps Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), a special form of patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2018, is frequently used in many hospitals worldwide for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). For example, at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, the investigators perform about four iTBS treatments daily, amounting to about 1000 treatments a year. iTBS is safe, effective even in depressed patients that are refractory to standard pharmacological treatments, and has the advantage of increased efficiency over standard rTMS. The approved treatment protocol involves a stimulation intensity of 120% of the individual's resting motor threshold (rMT), an intensity associated with considerable sensory discomfort for patients. The application of a stimulation intensity of 120% rMT is common practice in many psychiatric TMS clinics, and is based on research with conventional rTMS indicating higher clinical efficacy with higher stimulation intensity . However, neuroplastic effects of iTBS of the motor cortex are generally observed at much lower intensities. Researchers have observed significant excitatory effects of iTBS when the intensity is 80% of active motor threshold (aMT), which is approximately 70% of reactive motor threshold (rMT). Moreover, the assumption that the neuromodulatory effects are greater with increasing stimulation intensity is highly debated, and recent research indicates that a linear dose-response relationship for prefrontal iTBS is unfounded. Yet, modulation of prefrontal excitability is thought to underlie the antidepressant effect of iTBS. The investigators still lack evidence for the choice of 120% rMT as the optimal intensity and the presumed superiority of higher stimulation strengths over lower intensities is yet to be investigated. This is a knowledge gap that has important clinical implications because more tolerable treatments could result in greater adherence, and therefore ultimately better outcomes. Here, the investigators propose a randomized, multicentre, triple-arm, controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy of a 4-week treatment of daily iTBS at 75% (iTBS75) and 120% (iTBS120) rMT compared to sham iTBS (SiTBS). The choice to compare SiTBS with iTBS75 and iTBS120 is based on the following considerations: SiTBS will reveal placebo antidepressant effects and serves as a control condition. iTBS75 is chosen because iTBS at 80% aMT shows significant excitatory effects of the motor cortex and equals approximately 70% rMT. However, the distance from the coil to the motor cortex is on average 12.7mm whereas the distance to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is about 14.4 mm. Hence, a resting motor threshold of 70% at the motor cortex corresponds to a distance-adjusted rMT of approximately 75% at the DLPFC. Finally, iTBS120 is chosen as it is the standard stimulation intensity in current iTBS trials for depression. Our proposed study will elucidate the potential antidepressant effect of iTBS treatment at a much lower stimulation intensity than that currently employed by most centres and approved in the U.S. Hence, our study has a high potential to pave the way towards establishing a treatment regimen with increased adherence and lower rates of withdrawal. Aims and Hypotheses to be tested: This randomized, multicentre, triple-arm, controlled clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of SiTBS with iTBS75 and iTBS120 after four weeks of daily treatments in patients with MDD. The investigators hypothesize that iTBS75 will be more effective in reducing depressive symptoms compared with SiTBS and iTBS120. More specifically, (1) the investigators hypothesize that the rate of response, defined as a reduction of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score to ≤50% of baseline values after treatment is significantly higher for iTBS75, compared to sham stimulation and iTBS120 (primary hypothesis). In a secondary analysis, the investigators will test the hypothesis that (2) the rate of remission, defined as a final MADRS score of ≤8, over the course of four weeks of treatment is significantly higher for iTBS75, compared to the other two arms. Similarly, the investigators hypothesise that the increase of (3) subjective mood and (4) happiness, assessed using PHQ-9 and SHS, respectively, is significantly higher for iTBS75, compared to the other two arms. Finally, the investigators hypothesize that (5) iTBS75 is more tolerable than iTBS120, as indicated by a lower reported pain sensation during iTBS75 compared to iTBS120.