Comparison of Airway Management With Bronchial Blocker and Double-Lumen Tube in Single-Lung Ventilation

This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial. After obtaining ethical approval, 66 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and providing consent, who will undergo minimal invasive cardiac surgery at Ankara City Hospital Heart and Vascular Hospital Operating Room, will be included in the study. Patients will be randomized into two groups using a sealed envelope method (Group DLT: Group undergoing Single-Lung Ventilation with a Double-Lumen Tube, and Group BB: Group undergoing Single-Lung Ventilation with a bronchial blocker within a single-lumen Endotracheal Tube). Both groups will receive standard anesthesia induction and maintenance. Patients brought to the operating room without premedication will start invasive blood pressure monitoring with awake intra-arterial cannulation in addition to standard ASA monitoring. Anesthesia induction will be performed with 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 1 µg/kg fentanyl, 1 mg/kg propofol, and 0.7 mg/kg rocuronium. After 3 minutes of anesthesia induction, a double-lumen tube/endotracheal tube-bronchial blocker of the appropriate size based on patients' height and gender will be placed. Tube placement will be confirmed with the assistance of a flexible bronchoscope in both groups. During anesthesia maintenance, the gas mixture of 50%/50% oxygen/air with 1-2% sevoflurane will be adjusted to maintain BIS between 40-60. During mechanical ventilation, in both groups, tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg, respiratory rate of 10-12/min, and PEEP of 4-5 cmH2O will be set for double-lung ventilation, and for single-lung ventilation, tidal volume of 4-6 ml/kg, respiratory rate of 12-14/min, and PEEP of 4-5 cmH2O will be adjusted to maintain PIP\<25cmH2O, SpO2\>90, and PaCO2\<40 mmHg (based on ideal body weight). Apart from the two compared airway management techniques, both groups will receive standard anesthetic care, multimodal analgesia, and cardiopulmonary bypass method. Determining the impact of these methods on pulmonary functions is crucial to avoid adding potential pulmonary complications related to the inflammatory damage caused by the cardiopulmonary bypass pump to the airway management used for single-lung ventilation. Additionally, comparing the rates of technical complications and placement times for these techniques can guide anesthesia management. Both techniques are routinely used in our clinic for the minimal invasive cardiac surgery procedure based on the preference of anesthesia providers.