Effect of Empagliflozin vs Linagliptin on Glycemic Outcomes,Renal Outcomes & Body Composition in Renal Transplant Recipients With Diabetes Mellitus

In the early postoperative period, hyperglycemia is frequently seen in renal transplant recipients primarily because of high doses of immunosuppressive therapy. Many of these patients have pre-existing type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, 10-20% of renal transplant recipients develop new onset persisting hyperglycemia following renal transplantation, known as posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). These patients need optimal glycemic control in order to prevent development of cardiovascular and de novo renal disease. Most of these patients receive insulin therapy following transplantation, as they receive steroid therapy and oral hypoglycemic agents are better avoided. However, as steroids are tapered and need for insulin diminishes, several anti-diabetic agents are initiated off-label, such as metformin, DDP-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exhibit nephroprotective effects in individuals with native kidney disease, with or without type 2 diabetes. However, the data regarding the safety and glycemic efficacy of these glucose-lowering agents in the renal transplant setting are scarce. DPP-4 inhibitors are glucose-lowering agents used in patients with CKD. For instance, linagliptin is used in all eGFRs without dose modification. The data regarding the safety and efficacy of linagliptin are scarce in patients following renal transplantation. Since patients following renal transplantation receive immunosuppressants and steroids, which may affect their body composition. Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP-4 inhibitors on body composition in patients following renal transplantation is not well established. In this study, we aimed to examine the safety and effect of empagliflozin (an SGLT2 inhibitor) versus linagliptin (an DDP-4 inhibitor) on the glycemic outcomes, renal outcomes and body composition in renal transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus.

This EmLina Renal trial is an investigator initiated, single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized clinical study to examine the safety and effect of empagliflozin 25 mg once a day vs. linagliptin 5 mg once a day for 12 months on glycemic outcomes, renal outcomes and body composition in renal transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus. Glycemic variables will include fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Renal outcomes will include change in eGFR, spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) and spot urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR). Body composition variables will include total fat mass, fat percentage, total lean mass, and bone mineral content as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Body composition will also be measured by BIA. The study will be conducted according to the CONSORT guidelines. The patient population for the trial will be derived from Medanta-The Medicity Hospital endocrine and nephrology out-patient clinic. The study will be conducted in Medanta-The Medicity Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, which is a tertiary care center in North India. Patients deemed eligible will be screened for the trial. The clinical trial protocol has been approved by the institutional ethics review board. Informed written consent will be obtained from all the participants before enrolment into the study. Baseline assessment at screening All patients will undergo a baseline assessment before randomization, including detailed medical history, physical examination including anthropometry and biochemical evaluation. Randomization A research assistant will randomize the patients into either Empa group or Lina group in a 1:1 ratio using computer-generated numbers. Study visits After careful assessment at the baseline visit, patients meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to receive empagliflozin 25 mg once a day tablet for 12 months. The Lina group will receive linagliptin 5 mg daily for 12 months. Both groups will receive metformin and/or insulin and/or sulfonylureas for the management of diabetes. The study design included 3 in-person visits (baseline and months 6 and 12) and 2 telephonic visits (at months 3 and 9). Primary and secondary outcomes The primary outcome measure is the change in renal outcomes (changes from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), spot urine albumin- creatinine ratio and spot urine protein-creatinine ratio). The secondary outcome measures are changes in total fat content, fat percentage, lean mass and bone mineral content from baseline (as measured by DEXA); changes in total fat content, fat percentage, lean mass and bone mineral content from baseline (as measured by BIA), and glycemic variables (fasting glucose and HbA1c at baseline, 6 and 12 months). The safety profile will be documented carefully at all in-person and telephonic visits. Statistical analysis Plan The analysis will include profiling of patients on different demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters etc. Quantitative data will be presented in terms of means and standard deviation and qualitative/categorical data will be presented as absolute numbers and proportions. To compare between the two groups, the Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical variables, and the independent samples t test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test will be used for the differences between continuous variables. Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to evaluate correlations between variables. Additional analyses of primary and secondary outcomes within treatment groups will be performed by using two-tailed independent sample t tests, paired t tests, or non-parametric tests, when indicated. P-value \< 0.05 is considered statistically significant. SPSS software will be used for analysis. Patient confidentiality Precautions will be taken to ensure confidentiality. Data collection forms will not reveal the name of patients included in study. All the participants will be covered by insurance to cover the cost of any untoward effect directly resulting from enrolment in the study.