Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy Steroid Trial

FCA is an acute, monophasic, presumed inflammatory disease that causes unilateral stenosis of the intracranial anterior circulation. In the medical literature, it has also been called transient cerebral arteriopathy (TCA) and post-varicella arteriopathy when it occurs after chicken pox. Although rare (1 to 3 cases seen per year at a typical academic children's hospital in the US), it is one of the most common causes of arterial ischemic stroke in a previously healthy child. Pediatric stroke investigators identified an FCA treatment trial as the #1 priority of the field (Steinlin M, Dev Med Child Neurol 2017) because of its aggressive natural history: it often progresses dramatically over days to weeks with recurrent or expanding infarcts. A 2017 European retrospective cohort study suggested that corticosteroid treatment may improve outcomes for FCA (Steinlin M, Stroke 2017). Europeans have begun the PASTA (Paediatric Arteriopathy STeroid Aspirin) trial (PI Steinlin): a "gold-standard" RCT to test the efficacy of corticosteroids for FCA. A 2018 survey of pediatric stroke investigators (participating in the NIH-funded Vascular effects of Infection in Pediatric Stroke, VIPS II, cohort study) revealed discomfort with randomization to "no steroids" as the majority now treat FCA with corticosteroids. However, despite attitudes favoring their use, corticosteroids were given to only 36% of 55 children with suspected FCA in the VIPS II cohort and (when given) were started a median of 3 days post-stroke (IQR 1.5, 6) (unpublished preliminary data). This incongruity reflects diagnostic uncertainty at stroke baseline: the characteristic arteriopathy evolution is needed for definitive diagnosis of FCA, and ≈1 in 5 children with suspected FCA at baseline have an alternate diagnosis. Hence, the pressing clinical question is: Should we treat all children with suspected FCA immediately or wait and treat only the subset that demonstrate disease progression? Early treatment has the potential advantage of preventing FCA progression, but the disadvantage of over treatment of those with alternate diagnoses. With a comparative effectiveness approach, the FOCAS trial will compare these two treatment approaches. FOCAS will also collect the steroid treatment safety data needed to guide clinical decisions.