Rationale and background:
The combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing estetrol (E4) and drospirenone (DRSP) (E4/DRSP) is a novel oral contraceptive containing a fixed dose of E4 (14.2 mg) and DRSP (3 mg). E4 is a natural oestrogen only produced during pregnancy by the foetal liver. When combined with the progestin DRSP, ovulation is inhibited. The E4/DRSP combination may have less impact on hepatic and haemostasis parameters in comparison to combinations of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) or EE and DRSP. Yet, it is unknown whether this regimen has an impact on the cardiovascular risk associated with the use of hormonal contraceptives.
Study design:
Multinational, comparative, prospective, active surveillance study that follows two cohorts. The cohorts consist of new users (starters and restarters ) of two different groups of hormonal contraceptives: E4/DRSP and EE/LNG. The study is taking a non-interventional approach to provide comprehensive information on these treatments in a routine clinical practice setting. Study participants will be enrolled via an international network of COC-prescribing health care professionals (HCPs) and then followed up for one to two years. All outcomes of interest will be captured by direct contact with the study participants. Reported outcomes of interest will be validated via attending physicians and relevant source documents. The classification of outcomes of interest into 'confirmed' and 'not confirmed' will be verified by blinded independent adjudication.
Population:
Approximately 101,000 study participants (50,500 E4/DRSP and 50,500 EE/LNG new users) will be recruited via a network of COC-prescribing health care professionals in Europe, the USA, and Brazil. All new users (starters and restarters) prescribed E4/DRSP or EE/LNG who are willing to participate may be eligible for enrolment in the study.
Data sources:
This is a field study that entails exposure to COCs and the occurrence of clinical outcomes of interest by completing questionnaires at baseline (study entry) and follow-up (at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months post-baseline), in addition to potential confounding factors and potential effect modifiers. Medical confirmation of the occurrence of a clinical outcome of interest will be sought from the attending HCP and/or study participant (e.g., diagnostic report, discharge letter).
Study size:
The study is sufficiently powered to show non-inferiority of E4/DRSP compared to EE/LNG assuming that the VTE risk among E4/DRSP users is not higher than among EE/LNG users. For this purpose, a total of 101,000 women (50,500 E4/DRSP users and 50,500 EE/LNG users) will be recruited and followed up taking into account treatment adherence, treatment stopping/switching, and lost to follow-up (LTFU)/dropout.
Data analysis:
The final analyses will include both an "as-treated" (AT) and an "intention-to-treat" (ITT) analysis. All eligible women will be assigned to the ITT and AT population at baseline. Only women with follow-up information will be considered for longitudinal analysis. Women who never started their prescribed baseline medication will be considered in the ITT analysis but excluded from the AT analysis. Population characteristics, e.g., socio-economic factors, parameters of reproductive, contraceptive history, and medical history, will be summarized descriptively and used to estimate the probability of treatment differences. Inverse probability of treatment weighting combined with time-to-event analysis of VTE will be carried out based on the extended Cox model to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals. The null hypothesis to be tested is HR of VTE ≥1.5 (i.e., the VTE HR for E4/DRSP vs. EE/LNG is higher than or equal to 1.5). The alternative hypothesis is HR of VTE \<1.5.
