SUCCEED Africa: Support, Comprehensive Care and Empowerment of People With Psychosocial Disabilities

Recognising the need for a framework for interventions to support people with psychosocial disabilities in LMICs, the WHO's 2010 CBR Guidelines included a special supplement on mental health, which drew mainly from expert opinion, evidence in community mental health, and basic development principles, to make recommendations for best practice. However, a 2016 review examining CBR for disabilities in LMICs identified only one example of CBR for psychosocial disabilities in Sub-Saharan Africa. The authors concluded that there was a need for more evidence from this region, in particular. As part of SUCCEED Africa's formative research, a systematic review of the grey literature on CBR for psychosocial disabilities in LMICs was undertaken, in case there was in fact evidence available that had been excluded as a result of the previous review's strict eligibility criteria. The grey literature review identified 33 different CBR programmes, 11 of which were based in sub-Saharan Africa, but the quality of the evidence was generally very poor and too heterogeneous for any sort of meta-analysis. In contrast to previous reviews, the grey literature review found that the majority of programmes were not focused primarily on health, covering more domains of the CBR Matrix (e.g. livelihoods, empowerment, education, etc.). This suggests a disconnect between how CBR programmes are designed and evaluated to optimise clinical outcomes for research purposes, versus how they are designed to meet pragmatic needs in real-world practice. The SUCCEED pilot will use a before-and-after study design looking at changes in subjective quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) among participants with lived experience of psychosis who are offered the SUCCEED intervention over a four-month follow-up period. Key components of the SUCCEED intervention are peer support, case management and livelihoods activities, which are delivered by a gender-mixed team including one peer support worker and one community support worker embedded in a local organisation for persons with disabilities (OPD) in each SUCCEED country. Nested within this pilot are three other components, described further in the full research protocol (available upon request) : * A baseline assessment of the feasibility and acceptability of WHOQOL-BREF as a measurement tool (time taken to administer, proportion of participants who complete the tool, perspectives of data collectors assessed through interviews), face validity (assessed through cognitive interviewing) of WHOQOL-BREF, and the validity of proxy (completed by a close family member) versus self-completion. * A qualitative study using a combination of focus groups (participants with psychosis, family members) and interviews (peer support workers, community support workers, supervisors, data collectors) to further examine the acceptability and feasibility of the SUCCEED's research and M\&E tools (including WHOQOL-BREF) and processes. * A process evaluation drawing on semi-structured observations and routine monitoring and evaluation (M\&E) of intervention delivery, competency assessment of the two frontline providers (peer support workers and community support workers, via ENACT) research administrative data (adverse events, drop-outs), and end-line qualitative data (see above) to assess key process indicators and implementation outcomes (e.g. acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, safety, etc.).