The study of the cerebral mechanisms underlying mental functions, specifically in humans, relies on two sources of data: the study of patients with brain lesions and neuroimaging. While neuroimaging has experienced spectacular developments in recent years, allowing for the characterization of the functional properties of multiple brain systems, only the study of patients can establish the causal involvement of these regions in the processes at hand by observing the selective deficits resulting from lesions. This logic applies not only to acquired focal lesions resulting from, for example, vascular accidents or surgical resections but also to selective developmental cognitive disorders such as dyslexia or dyscalculia, which have been shown to result from focal abnormalities in brain development.
Over the years, research teams employing this protocol have successfully utilized both approaches, and in an innovative manner, combined them in studies exploring cognitive deficits using neuroimaging. For example, Gaillard et al. (2006) and Epelbaum et al. (2008) investigated reading disorders related to small cortical lesions by combining behavioral studies, anatomical MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of white matter tracts, functional MRI, and intracerebral recordings of evoked potentials (EPs) in the same patient. The rarity of behavioral profiles such as acquired reading disorders motivates the use of an approach known as "single-case studies." Significant advancements in neuropsychology have only been made possible through the study of single cases. In such studies, one or a few patients are examined in great detail on an individual basis, and their behavior is compared to explicit cognitive models of the specific function under investigation. Consequently, alongside standardized test batteries, evaluation protocols must necessarily be tailored and adapted to each individual case. On the other hand, group studies are not feasible for rare behavioral profiles such as acquired reading disorders (alexia) or visual perception impairments (agnosia). This unique case approach can be greatly enhanced by brain imaging. This is now achievable due to the sufficient power of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), enabling the analysis of activations in a single subject. Similarly, advancements in recording and data processing techniques in evoked potentials (EP) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) allow the analysis of individual patient performances. Furthermore, the flexible adaptation of stimulation protocols to each patient necessitates parallel data collection from a few control subjects whenever required.
Therefore, the aim of this exploratory project is to continue this work in cognitive neuroimaging, with the specific objective of comparing the results obtained from multiple non-invasive imaging methods (fMRI, EEG, and MEG) applied to patients with cerebral lesions (and to control groups of subjects as needed). In fact, within the scope of our exploratory study, the investigator aim to investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics of brain activity involved in specific higher cognitive functions in humans: language comprehension and production, mental calculation, as well as conscious and unconscious perception. The investigator will individually assess patients selected based on the nature of their deficit and the topography of their lesions, along with control subjects. Neurological patients will be followed for one year after consenting, with multiple testing and neuroimaging sessions. Patients may withdraw from the study at any time. Control subjects should be comparable to the patients in terms of age and sociocultural level and will, therefore, be matched for these variables in each patient's case. They will receive auditory stimuli through headphones or visual stimuli presented on a screen and will perform elementary tasks (memorization, comprehension, classification, production, etc.), indicating the correct response verbally or using response buttons when necessary. The investigator may refer the same subjects to different types of examinations (MRI, EP, MEG) to compare their results, which will be interpreted by integrating the neuropsychological analysis of the deficit and lesion topography. The investigator reserve the option to employ only one or two of these imaging methods in certain subjects. Additionally a group of healthy volunteers will be tested, with only the collection of their behavioral responses.
