Background: The massive scale-up of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) has led to a major reduction in malaria burden in many sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. This progress is threatened by the wide scale selection of insecticide resistant malaria vectors.
Study site: The study will be conducted in the department of Tiebissou (Gbeke Region in Lac district) Southern Bouake city, central Côte d'Ivoire. The Lac district is characterized by intense indoor malaria transmission with a prevalence of malaria reaching 51.3% in 2021 in children of under 5 years of age and extremely high pyrethroid resistance intensity in the main malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzii.
Study design: Three-arm superiority, single blinded, cluster-randomised trial with village as the unit of randomisation. The arms consist of; 1/ Veeralin LLIN, a net combining the synergist PBO and the pyrethroid alpha-cypermethrin, 2/Interceptor G2, a mixture LLIN incorporating two adulticides with different modes of action; chlorfenapyr and a pyrethroid (alpha-cypermethrin), and 3/ the control arm: MAGNet LLIN, an alpha-cypermethrin-only LLIN.
UPDATE: Following 1 year of follow-up, the trial was extended to assess the impact of the nets over a 3 year follow-up. In addition, we introduced school-based net top ups in half of the clusters- to evaluate the impact of top-up strategies on net ownership, access and usage and malaria outcomes.
Activities/Sample size:
A total of 33 villages (1 village = 1 cluster) with an average of 200 households will be identified and mapped. Nets will be distributed at a central point following national guidelines with 1 net for every 2 people.
To compare incidence of malaria cases between each intervention study arm and the control arm, a cohort of 50 children (45 + 5 to account for loss to follow up) will be recruited per cluster in 33 clusters for 12 months follow up to be able to detect a 35% relative reduction in malaria cases per child per year (rate ratio 0.65) between the intervention and the reference arms, assuming transmission in the control arm is 1.2 malaria cases per year with a coefficient of variation of 0.29 between clusters. The children will be visited twice a month during the transmission season (April to November) and once a month during the dry season.
Malaria infection prevalence cross-sectional surveys will be conducted, at baseline, 6 and 12 months after LLIN distribution. 50 people of all ages will be randomly selected from each of the 33 clusters (11 clusters per arm x 3 arms) and tested for malaria using RDT. The study will have 80% power to detect a relative 35% lower prevalence (prevalence ratio 0.65 in each intervention arm (VEERALLIN or Interceptor G2) relative to standard LLIN, assuming a prevalence of 50% in the control arm and a coefficient of variation of 0.3.
Vector density over 12 months will be followed using Human Landing Collection (HLC) indoor and outdoor with collection in 6 households in every cluster every 2 months. Assuming a mean mosquito density of 28 in the control arm, and a 60% reduction in mosquitoes in the intervention arms, with a coefficient of variation of 0.55 between clusters, this will give 80% power to detect differences at each timepoint.
Insecticide resistance intensity will be monitored at baseline and post intervention using adapted CDC bottle assays. The mechanism involved in resistance to pyrethroid and chlorfenapyr will be screened.
UPDATE: Epidemiological metrics remain the same for the extra two years of follow up. Entomological collections are now only done indoors, and in 12 households, within the transmission season. Insecticide resistance information will just be collected in the final year. We are also now collecting social science data and economic information.
Our main comparison is now top up villages compared to non-top-up villages- with sub-analysis for each arm type.
