This study will present 66 adult patients diagnosed with mild or moderate OSA (5 \<AHI ≤ 30/h) through polysomnography (PSG) level III, referred from pulmonology, otorhinolaryngology and/or neurology for treatment with MAD, who refuse or do not tolerate the therapeutic approach of CPAP, in the sleep unit of Hospital CUF Tejo. The randomization sequence will be generated by computer and kept confidential, in a sealed and opaque envelope, until the moment of recruitment. There will be 3 study groups:
Group A - Will perform pharyngeal CT with cephalometry and registration in maximum comfortable protrusion (MCP).
Group B - Will perform the DISE with registration in MCP. Group C - Will perform pharyngeal CT with cephalometry and recording in MCP + DISE with recording in MCP
In the first appointment, a complete anamnesis and a clinical examination will be carried out, where several items will be documented: Age, gender, BMI, mallampati index, neck, and waist circumference. The clinical interview will assess daytime sleepiness, nighttime snoring, and the patient's quality of life through the respective questionnaires: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the snoring severity scale (SSS), and the Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI). Using a Likert scale, the ESS is a quantitative assessment tool for drowsiness or the propensity to fall asleep in eight everyday situations. This instrument has been used in various contexts, populations, and clinical conditions, emphasizing sleep-disordered breathing, namely OSA. The SSS is a three-question questionnaire that assesses the intensity, frequency, and duration of snoring, completed by patients and their bed partners. The SSS is internally consistent across patients, regardless of age and sex, and externally valid, as it has a high correlation with the respiratory disturbance index (RDI), AHI, and ESS. The SAQLI was created as a specific quality-of-life instrument for patients with OSAS. This is a 35-item questionnaire that assesses the adverse impact of OSA in four domains: daily animosity, social interactions, emotional state, and symptoms. Items are scored on a 7-point scale. Still, in the 1st consultation, a PSG level III will be prescribed to assess the possibility of OSA and a CT of the pharynx with cephalometric analysis and recording in MCP to assess the UA and the prognosis of advancement of the mandible in the UA collapse/s.
After confirmation of mild to moderate OSA and application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will be randomly allocated into 3 study groups, with the randomization sequence generated by computer and kept secret in a sealed and opaque envelope until the time of recruitment:
Group A - Will undergo CT of the pharynx with cephalometry and recording in MCP and will be evaluated as a "poor candidate," "candidate with a moderate resolution," or "good candidate." Group B - Will perform the DISE with registration in MCP and will be evaluated as a "bad candidate," "candidate with a moderate resolution," or "good candidate." Group C - Will undergo pharyngeal CT with cephalometry and recording in MCP + DISE with MCP recording and will be evaluated as a "bad candidate," "candidate with a moderate resolution," or "good candidate."
In the second appointment, impressions will be made for the MAD, and in the third appointment, the MAD will be delivered.
After one month of use and adaptation to the MAD, the three groups will perform a PSG level III, in which the patient will have the MAD placed intra-orally, and the ESS, SSS, and SAQLI questionnaires will be filled out again, and the evaluation of adaptation to the MAD will be carried out (self-report).
After six months of using the MAD, the three groups will again perform a PSG level III, in which the patient will have the DAM placed intra-orally in the same mandibular advancement position that was placed in the previous follow-up. The ESS questionnaires will be completed, including SSS, SAQLI, and assessment of adaptation to the MAD (self-report).
The objective treatment outcome will be based on the PSG level III results with the MAD. An effective response to treatment will be defined as a reduction in AHI after treatment with MAD of 50% compared to baseline, and non-response will be described as a reduction in AHI of \<50%. For patients who do not present an effective response in the 1st Follow-up (where PSG level III will be performed one month after adaptation to the MAD), the MAD will be titrated (with more significant mandibular advancement) with the aim of, in the 2nd Follow-up up (where PSG level III will be performed six months after adaptation to the MAD) to obtain an adequate response, always thinking about the most significant possible AHI reduction to improve the patient's quality of life. It will also be analyzed whether the assessment during DISE, that the patient is a "good candidate," "candidate with a moderate resolution," and "poor candidate," is effective after PSG with MAD.
