This study uses a cluster-randomized design with cross-sectional baseline and endline surveys to generate a proof-of-concept around an implementation model that aims to strengthen systems for delivery of individual interventions and to strengthen convergence of multiple interventions on the same households/families. The primary objectives of the study are to answer the following questions:
1. To what extent and through which pathways can overall system strengthening approaches improve quality of delivery of health and ICDS services?
2. To what extent and through which pathways do system strengthening approaches and focused local efforts to engage multiple sectors improve coverage of individual interventions and co-coverage of multiple interventions in the first 1,000-days?
3. Can efforts to improve the nutritional value and palatability of take-home rations within the ICDS increase acceptability and use?
This study will also measure a range of secondary outcomes, for each research question as well as outcomes that pertain to the pathways of impact of the five intervention components. These include
* MIYCN capacity building
* Strengthening Supportive Supervision (SS) of the ICDS \& Health Supervisory Cadre
* Strategic Use of Data (SUD) \& Convergent Action Plan
* Involving Panchayati Raj Members (PRIs) for improved Co-Coverage of nutrition services
* THR offering refinement
Prior to the baseline survey, 13 out of 26 blocks from three districts randomly allocated to receive interventions. Another 13 blocks from the same three districts were randomly allocated to the comparison groups which received standard government services. The selection of three districts was based on the discussion between A\&T team and the Government of Gujarat. A team comprising of representatives from A\&T, IFPRI and local government worked closely to ensure matching and comparability between the intervention and comparison blocks using a propensity score matching method prior to randomization to intervention or comparison groups.
At baseline, information related to primary and secondary outcomes will be collected, along with indicators along the pathway from program inputs to outcomes. Insights on implementation will be documented throughout the evaluation period through routine meetings with the implementation teams, field visits by the research team, review of monitoring data collected by the implementation team, and backend data from the supervisory and PRI apps. Endline will be collected after approximately one year from baseline and will use mixed methods approach wherein surveys will be conducted at the sector, village, and household levels and semi-structured interviews will be conducted with the block and district staff. In addition, observations will be conducted of interactions between supervisors and FLWs at the village level. Finally, an assessment of child growth outcomes will be conducted after exploring the availability and data quality of longitudinal data being gathered at AWCs by IIPH-G, contingent on data access and approval from the state government.
