Thyroglobulin Point of Care Assay for Rapid Detection of Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma

Methods and materials Hypothesis: The diagnostic accuracy of the novel POC-Tg will be comparable with the current diagnostic methods used for the evaluation of cervical LNs suspected as DTC metastases. Aim 1. To validate the POC-Tg in the FNA clinic: Indeterminate or suspicious cervical LNs in patients with known or suspected DTC will be assessed using both the novel POC-Tg, and the formal evaluation (formal immunoassay for Tg and cytology). 2. To validate the POC-Tg in the OR: Indeterminate or suspicious cervical LNs in patients operated for DTC will be assessed using both the novel POC-Tg and the formal evaluation (frozen section and/or final histology in the pathological institution). Significance: An accurate POC-Tg may change current diagnostic and treatment approaches of patients with suspected metastatic DTC and improve patient management. Study design: The investigators will conduct a multi-center study. All coded data will be managed centrally, using an electronic case report form, by Soroka University Medical Center (SUMC) Clinical Research Center. All the data for sensitivity and specificity evaluations of the novel POC-Tg, and the current diagnostic methods of DTC cervical LN metastasis will be analyzed retrospectively against the reference ('gold') standard (see below). Clinical decisions will be made according to the current guidelines and accepted approaches for the evaluation of cervical LN that are suspected as DTC metastases (in the FNA clinic, the combination of FNAC and FNA-Tg; and in the OR, frozen section and/or final histology). Detailed Study Protocol 1. The FNA clinic arm: All recruited patients will undergo US examination of the neck using an US scanner with a 12.5-MHz linear phased-array transducer. US-guided FNA of suspicious or indeterminate LN will be performed by an experienced physician (an endocrinologist, otolaryngologist, or a radiologist), as clinically indicated. LN will be classified as suspicious if any of the following imaging features is present: calcification, cystic change, hyper-echogenicity, or peripheral or diffuse increased vascularity on color Doppler imaging. LN will be classified as indeterminate suspicious when neither clear benign nor suspicious imaging features are found (neither echogenic hilum nor hilar vascularity in the absence of suspicious findings). The FNA procedure will be performed under US guidance with the free hand technique using a 22 to 25-gauge needle connected to a 3 to 10-mL syringe, as routinely performed in each medical center. If technically and clinically possible, each LN will be sampled twice: one passage for cytology and one passage for FNA-Tg washout. FNA for cytology (FNAC)- FNAC specimens will be prepared from direct smears and/or liquid-based cytology, as routinely performed in each medical center. In the FNA clinic at SUMC, specimens will be smeared on slides and immediately fixed in 95% ethanol using the direct smear method. With the liquid-based cytology method, specimens will be prepared using the ThinPrep PreservCyt® (Hologic Ins., Marlborough, MA, USA). Cytology findings will be interpreted by cytopathologists specialized in thyroid cytology. The cytology results obtained from the LN of interest will be categorized as: malignant, benign, or indeterminate. FNA-Tg and POC-Tg- After the needle is localized inside the LN of interest, a negative pressure will be produced by the syringe handle, while performing inward-outward and rotatory movement, until a bloody material is seen in the proximal end of the needle. Thereafter, 100 µL of 0.9% (w/v) saline will be drawn via the needle into the syringe that will contain 100 µL of mildly bloody aspirate from the LN of interest. The aspirate will then be transferred into an Eppendorf tube through the same needle that was used for the FNA procedure. At this time the product bag of the POC-Tg kit will be opened. Using a disposable pipette, 40 µL will be aspirated from the Eppendorf tube and dripped into the middle of the sample well of the POC-Tg kit. Two drops of the buffer will then be dispensed into the middle of the sample well. Results of the POC-Tg will be obtained and documented after 10 minutes. To compare the accuracy of the POC-Tg kit to the formal immunoassay for Tg that is used in each institution, 0.9% saline will be added to the aspirate that will be left in the Eppendorf tube to a final volume of 0.6 mL, then transferred into a gel containing tube and sent to the clinical laboratory that performs Tg measurement. Reference ('gold') Standard- LN will be finally diagnosed as metastatic if they show malignant FNA cytology (Bethesda 6) or meeting at least one of the following criteria: (i) malignancy confirmation based on the surgical specimen (histology), (ii) subsequent repeat FNA or core-needle biopsy reporting Bethesda 6 or DTC, respectively, or (iii) follow-up with imaging after one year showing clear US features of metastasis. LN with benign or indeterminate FNA cytology free of metastatic disease by the same criteria will be finally diagnosed as benign. Routine laboratory assessment- Analytes as plasma Tg, anti-Tg-antibodies, anti-thyroid-peroxidase, TSH, free T4, and free T3 will be performed as part of the routine evaluation of patients with suspected or known thyroid disease. Required data (data to capture): * Technical data (per center): The firm of the US used in each institution, type of FNA-Tg immunoassay (type, firm, limit of detection, reported accuracy), cytological evaluation used (type and firm). * Demographic and clinical data: Date of birth, date of the index procedure, age (years) at the time of the index procedure, past diagnosis of Hashimoto thyroiditis (ICD9 code 2452), past diagnosis of Grave's disease (ICD9 code 2420), treated with levothyroxine or an anti-thyroid-drug, prior thyroid surgery (no, lobectomy \[left/right\], sub-total thyroidectomy, complete thyroidectomy), prior neck dissection (central \[no, right, left\], lateral level 2-4 \[no, right, left\], lateral level 5 \[no, right, left\]). * Laboratory data prior to the index procedure (each will be reported with units used by the laboratory where it was performed, and as X upper limit of norm): TSH, Tg, anti-Tg- antibodies, free T4, free T3, anti-thyroid peroxidase. * Regarding US findings of the thyroid gland, the following information will be accessed for the most suspicious nodule: TIRADS points, TIRADS class, American Thyroid Association class, three dimensions, and volume. * US findings of the LN from which the procedure is done (yes/no for each): echogenic hilum, hilar vascularity, calcification, cystic change, hyper-echogenicity, peripheral or diffuse increased vascularity on color Doppler imaging, final interpretation (indeterminate/suspicious). * Cytological report of the most suspicious/relevant thyroid nodule: Bethesda system score. * Cytological findings of the LN from which the procedure is done: classified as benign, indeterminate, or malignant. * FNA-Tg- units as reported by the institutional lab, and X upper limit of norm. * POC-Tg- positive or negative. * Final histology 2. The OR arm: Thyroid/neck surgery and Ex-vivo FNA- All recruited patients will be operated, as clinically indicated, either as part of primary treatment for DTC or for persistent or recurrent DTC. Thyroid and neck dissection surgeries will be led by experienced otolaryngologist or endocrine surgeons. Whenever an indeterminate or suspicious LN is found, and it is deemed that a frozen section report of the LN may change surgery extent, the LN will be dissected and evaluated by both the formal evaluation-frozen section and POC-Tg. Following dissection of the LN, the ex-vivo FNA-Tg and POC-Tg will be conducted as detailed above (under the 'FNA-Tg and POC-Tg' section). Frozen section- The relevant specimen for frozen section will be dissected, treated, and sent to pathological evaluation as clinically indicated and routinely performed in each medical center. All clinical decisions during the surgery will be made according to the frozen section results or clinical judgment. The histology results of the frozen section analysis, obtained from the LN of interest, will be categorized as: malignant, benign, or indeterminate/inconclusive. Reference ('gold') Standard- LN will be finally diagnosed as benign or malignant (DTC metastasis) according to the final histological report. Required data: * Technical data (per center): Frozen section equipment, type of FNA-Tg immunoassay (type, firm, limit of detection, reported accuracy). * Demographic and clinical data: Date of birth, date of the index procedure, age (years) at the time of the index procedure, past diagnosis of Hashimoto thyroiditis (ICD9 code 2452), past diagnosis of Grave's disease (ICD9 code 2420), treated with levothyroxine or an anti-thyroid-drug, prior thyroid surgery (no, lobectomy \[left/right\], sub-total thyroidectomy, complete thyroidectomy), prior neck dissection (central \[no, right, left\], lateral level 2-4 \[no, right, left\], lateral level 5 \[no, right, left\]). * Laboratory data prior to the index procedure (each will be reported with units used by the laboratory where it was performed, and as X upper limit of norm): TSH, Tg, anti-Tg- antibodies, free T4, free T3, anti-thyroid peroxidase. * Cytological report of the most suspicious/relevant thyroid nodule: Bethesda system. * Cytological findings of the relevant LN: classified as benign, indeterminate, or malignant. * The planned operation: lobectomy \[left/right\], sub-total thyroidectomy, complete thyroidectomy, neck dissection (central \[no, right, left\], lateral level 2-4 \[no, right, left\], lateral level 5\[no, right, left\]). * FNA-Tg- units as reported by the institutional lab, and X upper limit of norm. * POC-Tg- positive or negative. * The frozen section report: malignant, benign, or indeterminate/inconclusive. * Overall time needed for the frozen section evaluation - from dissection to report (minutes). * The operation that was executed: as planned/ extended (specify). * Final histology Statistical analysis: The estimates of sensitivity and specificity will be calculated for the positive and negative samples, respectively, while their status will be defined using the reference ('gold') standard (diagnostic procedure depending on cytology and histology results, and other clinical information). To address the main objectives of the study, the 95% confidence interval will be constructed around each of the validation parameters. A design effect will be considered for the samples taken in the OR that originate from the same patient, using a sandwich estimator of the standard error. Furthermore, the researchers will explore potential factors associated with agreement and disagreement of the diagnostic test with the reference ('gold') standard. Specifically, characteristics of patients in whom the diagnosis was aligned with the reference ('gold') standard will be compared to those with discordant results. This type of analysis will indicate populations, if any, for which the test should not be utilized. The comparisons will be conducted using standard statistical methodology, i.e. Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact test for categorical variables and t-test, ANOVA or non-parametric alternative tests for continuous parameters. Confidence intervals will be adjusted to clustered observations as appropriate.