Multicenter Observational Study for the Evaluation in Clinical Practice of Urinary Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis

The investigators will conduct a multicenter observational no-profit study to investigate the impact of Low Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) management on subjective measure of patient global impression of improvement. Initial management of LUTS in MS should address both voiding and storage deficiency symptoms and is determined by the severity of symptoms and the risk of developing upper urinary tract damage. First-line treatments include behavioral / physical ones, such as rehabilitation of the pelvic floor, and pharmacological ones (antimuscarinics, alpha-lytics, beta3 agonists); second-line treatments are represented by intradetrusorial (or intrasphinteric) injection of botulinum toxin and by non-invasive (percutaneous and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation) and invasive (sacral neuromodulation) neuromodulation techniques; third-line treatments consist of surgical approaches. According to the various consensus and recommendations available for MS, the initial approach in most cases should be the prerogative of the neurologist, while the neurourologist should intervene when the initial treatment has been ineffective or there are pathologies of the urinary tract that require a non-postponable specialist evaluation. As regards the effectiveness of any initial management of LUTS in pcSM, there are, to the best of our knowledge, no studies in the literature that have analyzed the phenomenon, both in terms of subjective perception of clinical improvement and in objective terms of objective improved "voiding performance". This study was developed with the primary intention of measuring, through the observation of real clinical practice, the presence and extent of improvement (through the PGI-I scale) of the subject with LUTS after at least three months of any type of initial management. A subgroup analysis will help us to assess whether the neurologist's management of LUTS is different from that of the urologist in terms of perceived improvement. A patient reported outcome assessing quality of life (Qualiveen-SF), a three-day frequency / volume chart, and post-voiding residual volume (PVR) will be used as secondary outcomes to reveal the effectiveness of the two approaches on quality of life and data objective measures of urinary disorders. The study also aims to 1) evaluate the prevalence of LUTS through a new diagnostic algorithm that consists of two questionnaires (the Urinary Bothersome Questionnaire-MS and the Actionable Bladder Symptoms Screening Tool-ABSST) and an objective measure of voiding dysfunction-the PVR and 2) analyze the influence of the more common risk factors on the presence of LUTS as thus diagnosed.