Cognitive Training in Survivors of Covid-19: A Randomized Trial

As the Investigators have described, a frequent and particularly disabling consequence of Covid-19 may be in the cognitive arena, with deleterious implications for employment, quality of life, and other dimensions of functioning. As such, efforts to develop interventions aimed at improving neuropsychological outcomes are important and a key feature of an overarching public health strategy. One potential intervention of interest is cognitive training, which has been employed with increasing success with wide-ranging populations, though only minimally with survivors of critical illness and not with Covid-19 patients at all. Cognitive training, particularly the kind that relies on what are known as digital interventions (programs which, functionally, look like video games) is particularly appropriate in the pandemic climate, as it can be done entirely in a virtual contactless fashion, thus decreasing the risk of infection. The Investigators propose a pilot study in 100 cognitively impaired community dwelling patients who tested positive for Covid-19 and are participants in an existing study/ongoing study of household transmission of Covid-19 (the SARS-Co-V-2 Household Transmission Study, with the following specific aim and hypotheses: Study Aim: To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of a digital app-based intervention (AKL-T01) to improve 4-week cognition (post-intervention) in cognitively impaired survivors of Covid-19. Hypothesis 1: A trial evaluating AKL-T01 for improving long-term cognition in community dwelling and cognitively abnormal COVID-19 patients will be feasible, as denoted by achieving each of the following in this pilot trial: (a) recruitment and successful protocol completion of up to 100 patients; (b) successful completion of 4-week cognitive assessments by \>80% of survivors; and (c) the primary cognitive outcome (a composite score on CNS Vital Signs) numerically favoring the intervention group with the one-tailed upper 80% confidence interval of the difference in a composite outcome between the intervention and placebo groups containing the minimally-important clinical difference on a CNS Vital Signs composite measure.