Loading clinical trials...

Effectiveness of Different Membrane Applications in Vertical Ridge Augmentation | Clinical Trials | Clareo Health

COMPLETEDNA

Effectiveness of Different Membrane Applications in Vertical Ridge Augmentation

Effectiveness of Different Membrane Applications (Perforated Polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) vs. Perforated PTFE+ Collagen Membrane) in Vertical Ridge Augmentation - Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT04843488•Urban Regeneration Institute

View on ClinicalTrials.gov

Summary

This randomized clinical trial (RCT) study investigates if there is any difference in absolute vertical bone gain between perforated dense-polytetrafluroethylene (d-PTFE) mesh vs perforated d-PTFE mesh covered with a native collagen membrane. The primary endpoint is absolute vertical bone gain. The secondary endpoints are regeneration rate, complications rate, and pseudoperiosteum formation.

Eligibility

Age

18 - No limit years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Inclusion Criteria

•1. Partially edentulous patients requiring vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation
•2. patients agrees with conditions of the study and sign consent

Exclusion Criteria

•Insufficient oral hygiene
•Smoking
•Alcohol or Drug abuse
•acute local or systemic infections
•uncontrolled diabetes or other metabolic disease
•severe hepatic or renal disfunction
•autoimmune disease
•radiotherapy in the last 5 years
•patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy

Locations (1)

Urban Regeneration Institute

Budapest, Hungary

Key Dates

Start Date

April 15, 2021

Primary Completion Date

November 12, 2022

Completion Date

May 2, 2023

Last Updated

December 4, 2024

Enrollment

ACTUAL participants

Conditions

Bone RegenerationDental ImplantsPolytetrafluoroethylene

Interventions

Guided bone regeneration with a PTFE membrane

PROCEDURE

Guided bone regeneration with a PTFE+collagen membrane

PROCEDURE

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Dentsply Sirona PrimeTaper Implants

NCT05500755

Dental Implants

View study

RECRUITINGNA

Clinical Evaluation of a Modified Technique for Free Gingival Graft Stabilization Using Titanium Fixation Tacs Around Implants Versus Conventional Suturing Technique

NCT07019428

Free Gingival GraftSoft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implants+1 more

View study

Data Source & Attribution

This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

ClinicalTrials.gov last update: December 4, 2024Data synced to Clareo: March 29, 2026

Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.

Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.

View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions

Effectiveness of Different Membrane Applications in Vertical Ridge Augmentation

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Dentsply Sirona PrimeTaper Implants

Clinical Evaluation of a Modified Technique for Free Gingival Graft Stabilization Using Titanium Fixation Tacs Around Implants Versus Conventional Suturing Technique

Efficacy and Safety of Additive Manufacturing Personalized Titanium Mesh in Guided Bone Regeneration

The Application of Root Analogy Implant in Immediate Implantation

Implant-related Outcomes in the Context of Maxillary Sinus Lifting

Clinical Evaluation of a Hyperbolic Paraboloid Triple-Abutment on Morse Taper Dental Implants