Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Comparative Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Emergency Department Nurse Preference Between 2 Methods of Visualization for Midline Catheter Insertion: A Pilot Study
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a continuous needle tracking system on the accuracy, speed, and quality of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter insertion.
A pilot study using simulated tissue was conducted with 49 US-based emergency department nurses to compare insertion of a midline catheter using traditional ultrasound guidance versus an advanced needle-tracking technology along with traditional ultrasound guidance.
Age
All ages
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Austin Convention Center
Austin, Texas, United States
Start Date
October 14, 2019
Primary Completion Date
October 14, 2019
Completion Date
October 15, 2019
Last Updated
March 23, 2021
49
ACTUAL participants
Randomized Traditional
DEVICE
Cue(TM) Needle Tracking Technology
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
Becton, Dickinson and Company
NCT06433739
NCT05860231
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT05860634