Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Predicted Difficult Airway: Randomized Comparative Study
Videolaryngoscopy provides a better laryngeal view and do not need airway alignment for tracheal intubation.
The C-MAC-VS can be connected easily to the same C- MAC monitor and Pocket Monitor without requiring any additional light source and camera. This device is great for cases with limited mouth opening, airway obstruction and difficult intubation. C-MAC-VS has no lumens so it's very easy to clean and it can accommodates a size ETT 6.0 and greater.
Age
18 - 60 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
rehab Abd Elaziz
Alexandria, Egypt
Start Date
January 10, 2022
Primary Completion Date
May 1, 2022
Completion Date
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
June 1, 2022
160
ESTIMATED participants
C-MAC VS
DEVICE
C-MAC VL D -blade
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
Alexandria University
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06981923