Finding studies
Finding studies
Take this into the appointment.
Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Carol Borlido
CONTACT
Gary Remington, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Lead
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
This is a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial that will compare ED, i.e. alternate day dosing to daily dosing i.e. TAU. Individuals will be randomized to ED or TAU using a permuted block design with a random number generator. The size will be fixed and study personnel blinded to the randomization block size. To maintain a double-blind design, our pharmacy will provide, on an individualized basis, APs at the appropriate dose and placebo where necessary in matching gelatin capsules, packaged in blister packs. The active tablet will be over-encapsulated, and matching placebo will be prepared using the same capsules (filled with lactose). Thus, from the individual subject's position, AP treatment is continued according to the same daily schedule. Further, if their current medication is prescribed in divided doses, this too will be employed during the study. The minimum and maximum doses for Risperidone will be 1 mg and 16mg respectively. The minimum and maximum doses for Olanzapine will be 5 mg and 20mg respectively. The minimum and maximum doses for Paliperidone will be 3 mg and 12mg respectively. Other psychotropic medications prescribed before the study will be permitted, with any changes in dosing during its course documented The trial is 1 year in duration. To prevent bias, the study code will remain blinded until the trial's completion. Study visits will be scheduled every 2 weeks over the first 6 months, in line with the earlier investigation. Thereafter, the visits will be decreased to every 4 weeks, aligning with the schedule routinely observed in our ambulatory clinics. The investigators are asking the following questions: 1. (Non-inferiority) Can additional confirmatory evidence support "extended" AP dosing (ED) as an alternative to continuous administration, i.e. is it as effective clinically? 2. (Superiority) Can the investigators establish clinical benefits (e.g. better tolerability, fewer side effects, such as decreased glucose dysregulation) with ED? Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that with ED, there will be no change in symptom severity but improvement in the frequency and severity of side effects, wellbeing, and functioning.
Age
18–any
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
