Duration of Urinary Catheterization

This study is being conducted to determine the length of time a urinary catheter is needed to drain urine from the bladder after colorectal surgery. Urinary retention is a well known complication after pelvic colorectal surgery, and current practice is to continue urinary catheterization for 3- days following pelvic colorectal surgery in an effort to avoid this complication. However, prolonged urinary catheterization is associated with increased risk of urinary tract infections as well as longer hospital stays. The investigators hypothesize that postoperative urinary catheters may be safely removed on postoperative day 1 without increased urinary retention rates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a shorter duration of urinary catheterization (1 day) is non-inferior when compared to standard duration (3 days) in regards to postoperative urinary retention. The investigators plan to perform a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing the urinary catheter duration of 1 day and 3 days with the primary endpoint of postoperative urinary retention. Secondary endpoints are urinary tract infection and length of hospital stay. The participants will be randomly assigned to the control group (catheter removal on postoperative day 3) or the experimental group (catheter removal on postoperative day 1).

Disease Background: Total mesorectal excision can be associated with transient post-operative urinary retention due to surgical disruption of pelvic autonomic nerves during procedure. These patients receive intra-operative urinary catheter to prevent post-operative urinary retention. However, the optimal duration for post-operative urinary catheter is not known, and longer duration of urinary catheter is associated with increased morbidity, such as urinary tract infection. A previous prospective randomized controlled trial from 1999 looking at this subject showed an increased rate of postoperative urinary retention in patients who had shorter duration of urinary catheterization. However, surgical techniques have improved significantly since then and a newer retrospective study comparing outcomes between patients who had catheter removal on postoperative day 1 vs catheter removal on day 2 or later demonstrated lower rates of urinary retention overall and there was no difference in rates of urinary retention between the two groups. A recent randomized non--inferiority trial investigating early urinary catheter removal in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery found that early removal, when combined with an oral alpha- antagonist, is non--inferior to standard removal and is associated with lower rates of urinary tract infections and shorter hospital stays. Rationale: A current prospective randomized trial is needed to determine the optimal duration of urinary catheterization in patients who receive total mesorectal excision (TME). Urinary catheterization is an established part of the intraoperative and postoperative care for this surgery. There should be minimal urinary dysfunction as total mesorectal excision should preserve pelvic autonomic nerve function with careful dissection. Current standard of practice is removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3. The study participants would be exposed to minimal risk as they would already require urinary catheterization as part of the standard of care. While this study will determine duration of postoperative urinary catheterization, it will not impact the surgical procedure itself. The control group would undergo removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 and the experimental group would undergo removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 1. The main risk endured by study participants would be the need to replace the urinary catheter if the patient has urinary retention following catheter removal. This study will contribute to existing knowledge by providing a prospective randomized non--inferiority trial investigating the impact of duration of urinary catheterization following total mesorectal excision on rates of postoperative urinary retention, urinary tract infections, and length of hospital stay. If shorter duration of urinary catheterization is shown to be non--inferior to standard duration of catheterization in terms of postoperative urinary retention, adopting a practice of catheter removal on postoperative day 1 may result in lower rates of catheter--associated urinary tract infections and shorter hospital stays. This practice would also adhere to the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) measures which recommend removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 1 or 2. We hypothesize that postoperative urinary catheters may be safely removed on postoperative day 1 following total mesorectal excision without increased urinary retention rates when compared to removal on postoperative day 3. Study Design: This study will be conducted as a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. The investigators will evaluate all patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for study eligibility. Consent for participation in the study will be obtained perioperatively. All male patients will be given a survey to assess their international prostate symptom severity (IPSS) score preoperatively. After surgery, the participant will be randomly assigned to the control (day 3 catheter removal) or experimental (day 1 catheter removal) group if there were no intraoperative complications deemed to interfere with the study, such as genitourinary tract injury requiring prolonged urinary catheterization postoperatively. Randomization will be performed using Microsoft Excel using a reported simple randomization method. The control group will have catheter removed at 9AM on postoperative day 3, while the experimental arm will have catheter removed at 9AM on postoperative day 1. Participants will receive appropriate maintenance IV fluids depending on their ability to tolerate PO intake postoperatively. The primary endpoint of the study will be urinary retention, defined by grade 2 urinary retention per NCI CTCAE. Clinically, the investigators will identify these patients as those unable to void within 6 hours of urinary catheter removal with associated signs of suprapubic fullness and/or tenderness, and bedside ultrasound bladder scan showing more than 250cc of urine. Bladder scan will only be performed on patients who have signs of urinary retention and are unable to void within 6 hours of catheter removal. If subjects are unable to void spontaneously within 6 hours following catheter removal, a one-time straight catheterization will be performed, as per standard practice. If subjects are still unable to urinate within 6 hours following straight catheterization, an indwelling urinary catheter will be replaced. Secondary endpoints include urinary tract infection and length of hospital stay postoperatively. Urinary tract infection is defined as grade 2 or 3 urinary tract infection per NCI CTCAE. Patients will be evaluated for symptoms and signs of infection such as suprapubic pain, tenderness, dysuria, hematuria, and urinary frequency in addition to the presence of \>100,000 colony-forming units/mL of bacteria on urine culture. Urinalysis and urine culture will only be sent in the setting of clinical signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection. Patients identified with UTI will be treated with pathogen-appropriate antibiotics as per standard practice. Length of hospital stay will be defined as the number of admitted days in the hospital from day of surgery to day of discharge. The participants will remain in the study until discharge from the hospital. Data Collection: Data regarding patient's demographic, past medical history, surgical indication, surgical approach, intraoperative complications, and postoperative outcomes including the mentioned endpoints will be collected prospectively through the electronic medical record system. The international prostate symptom severity (IPSS) score will be completed preoperatively for all male patients. Patient's medical record number will be numerically encoded and stored in a separate file. All paper documentation, including the original consent form, will be stored in a secure cabinet in the division office. Follow up: There will not be post-discharge follow up for the purpose of the research. Only data related to patient's history and inpatient hospital stay will be collected. Therefore, the follow up period for the endpoints is up to day of discharge. Sample Size and Accrual: Previous studies have identified rates of urinary retention following rectal surgery to approximately 20%. Given no expected difference between the two groups, the investigators therefore anticipate the urinary retention rate of both the study and control group to be 20%. Using a type I error of 5%, a power of 0.8, and a non-inferiority limit of 15% as reported by literature (3), a sample size of 88 per group will be needed. Given the anticipated rate of approximately 10 total mesorectal excision procedures per month, the investigators anticipate needing 18 months to fulfill the required sample size. Data Analyses Plans: The two randomized groups will be compared in terms of their preoperative demographics, prior history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, surgical indication, cancer staging, and neoadjuvant treatments. Intraoperative and postoperative factors will also be compared between the two groups. Subgroup analysis may be performed stratifying patients with different surgical indications and/or cancer staging. Given that the main research question involves patients following TME, regardless of surgical indication, the study may not be powered to observe differences when performing subgroup analyses. Comparisons between groups will be analyzed by the chi square test, the Mann Whitney U test, or the Student t test for quantitative and qualitative variables, as appropriate. The early catheter removal will be considered noninferior to standard removal if the upper limit of a 1-sided 95% confidence interval excludes a difference in favor of the standard group of the standard group of more than 15%. A p-value of \<.05 will be considered statistically significant.