Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
This study compares the survival rates of both direct and indirect resin-based composite restorations in the treatment of severe tooth wear.
Tooth wear can lead to pain, discomfort and unsatisfying dental attractiveness and when severe, it can compromise the dentition's prognosis. Restorative therapies for treatment of severe tooth wear should be preferably minimally invasive and adhesive. This study compares two different treatment techniques for severe tooth wear. The first technique is regarded as the 'standard' technique. This is a full rehabilitation using only direct composite restorations (AP-X, Kuraray, Japan). The second technique comprises a full rehabilitation using both direct and indirect resin composite restorations (Estenia C\&B, Kuraray, Japan). 10 indirect restorations are placed on specific elements i.e. first molars and palatal sides of all maxillary anterior teeth. Other elements are restored conform the direct protocol. An important benefit for the patients is the rehabilitation of their worn dentitions. Functionality (teeth are less sensitive, improved chewing ability, better occlusal stability, etc) and aesthetics will be improved immediately after finishing the treatment. Indirect techniques have the advantage of a superior control over form of restorations.
Age
18 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Start Date
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2021
Completion Date
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 18, 2021
42
ACTUAL participants
Rehabilitation of severely worn dentitions using minimally invasive composite restorations (Estenia C&B or Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray, Osaka, Japan)
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborators
NCT06125132
NCT02289781
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT06273410