Loading clinical trials...

COMPLETEDNA

Comparison of Operating Room Time Length With the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning Versus Conventional Treatment of Mandible Fractures

NCT04283981•The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare operating room time between conventional treatment techniques \[without Virtual surgical Planning (VSP)\] versus treatment with use of Virtual surgical Planning (VSP) in patients that undergo mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

Eligibility

Age

18 - No limit years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

•Patient consent
•Complex mandible fracture (at least two fractures) that require ORIF of at least one fracture. This will exclude condylar fractures

Exclusion Criteria

•Patient refusal to participate in study
•Infected mandible fracture
•Closed reduction treatment of mandible fracture
•Fractures older than 2-3 weeks at the time of treatment
•Other concomitant mid-facial bone fractures (ie, zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC), Lefort fractures)
•Other etiologies than trauma of the mandibular fracture or pathologic fracture secondary to benign or malignant pathology that may require resection
•Pregnant patients will NOT be excluded from the study
•Co-morbidities (auto-immune disease, osteoporosis, titanium or metal allergy, uncontrolled diabetes (A1c greater than 8)

Locations (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Key Dates

Start Date

January 24, 2021

Primary Completion Date

October 31, 2022

Completion Date

November 10, 2022

Last Updated

June 20, 2024

Enrollment

ACTUAL participants

Conditions

Mandibular Fractures

Interventions

Control group without use of VSP

DEVICE

Treatment Group with use of VSP

DEVICE

Evaluation of Modified Omega Plate in the Management of Mandibular Fractures Compared With Conventional Fixation

NCT07206134

Mandibular FracturesFracture in Mental Nerve Region

View study

COMPLETEDPHASE4

3D Interlocking Miniplates in Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in the Mental Foramen Region: A Split-mouth Study

NCT06939010

Mandibular FracturesMiniplate

View study

Data Source & Attribution

This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

ClinicalTrials.gov last update: June 20, 2024Data synced to Clareo: March 29, 2026

Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.

Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.

View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions

Comparison of Operating Room Time Length With the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning Versus Conventional Treatment of Mandible Fractures

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Evaluation of Modified Omega Plate in the Management of Mandibular Fractures Compared With Conventional Fixation

3D Interlocking Miniplates in Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in the Mental Foramen Region: A Split-mouth Study

Tricalcium Phosphate and Chitosan as Bone Regenerator Versus Autologous Graft in Surgery for Mandibular Fracture

Mandibular Angle Fracture and Interframents Gap

Herbert Screw vs Lag Screw Fixation in Anterior Mandibular Fracture Treatment

Evaluation of Customized V Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates of Mandibular Angle Fracture