The investigators have 3 specific aims:
Specific Aim #1: Compare patients' postoperative pain experience and satisfaction with pain control using two different opioid prescribing schemes.
The investigators' working hypothesis is that postoperative pain control and satisfaction will be non-inferior between patients routinely prescribed opioids vs. those not routinely prescribed opioids prior to surgery.
Participants will be asked to complete a pain diary and assessment of their pain control satisfaction postoperatively. Pain control will be assessed by Likert scores (0-10) and satisfaction with pain control will be queried using an integer scale of 0-5 using REDCap or paper survey for the first 7 days postoperatively.
Specific Aim #2: Examine the opioid use of patients following midurethral sling.
The investigators will test the hypothesis that most patients who undergo MUS do not use prescribed opioid regardless of prescription scheme.
Given the investigators' standard of care preoperative education, including detailed instruction on non-opioid related pain management, they will prospectively examine the use of opioids after MUS under two different opioid prescribing routines. Women who agree to participation will be randomized to either be discharged home from surgery with a standard opioid prescription vs. only prescribed opioids if requested. The amount of opioid used will be collected via REDCap or paper survey for the first 7 days postoperatively. Investigators will also assess the subsequent requests for opioid prescription (among those not routinely given opioid prescription at discharge) or refill (among those who are initially given a standard amount of opioid upon discharge).
Specific Aim #3: Predict postoperative pain and opioid use after MUS with a brief psychometric questionnaire.
The investigators will leverage brief psychometric survey instruments in combination with individual demographic and clinical factors to predict postoperative pain and opioid use following MUS. They will seek to identify patients at risk for higher opioid needs or other pain interventions preoperatively, with a view to target education, prevention, and interventions on this population.
The project is original in comparing current clinical prescribing patterns with restrictive opioid prescribing. It capitalizes on providers' new ability to electronically prescribe opioids for patients who require them after discharge from the hospital, thereby decreasing the potential impact on patients and providers if prescribed opioid is requested once the patient has been discharged. The proposed work is innovative, because it examines recently developed psychometric survey instruments to identify patients at risk of postoperative pain. At the completion of this project, it is the investigators' expectation that the combination of work proposed in aims 1 -3 will optimize prescribing of opioids following this common MUS procedure, reducing the potential for both excessive opioid use (and adverse sequelae) postoperatively as well as unused opioid for subsequent misuse.
