The first reported subtotal cholecystectomy occurred in 1955. Additional case reports and studies have been carried out, further defining this terminology as a method of avoiding misidentification injuries of the biliary system or portal vasculature when critical view of safety cannot be safely achieved. Recent data supports the safety of this decision, showing equivalent morbidity rates to total cholecystectomy in a large metanalysis of 1,231 patients. Importantly, only 4 of the 30 included studies were prospective in nature, allowing definition variability and inconsistent reporting of outcomes. Additional reports showed variable data regarding effect on hospital LOS, need for secondary intervention (including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous drainage bilioma, or completion cholecystectomy), infectious complications, biliary or major vascular injury, and mortality. Some studies suggest that while subtotal cholecystectomy is associated with a decreased rate of bile duct injury and a lower conversion to open operation, this comes at the cost of increasing bile leak and recurrent biliary complications. Furthermore, the relatively recent distinction between fenestrating and reconstituting subtypes of subtotal cholecystectomy remain ill-defined in many of these studies, and outcomes between the two modalities remain variable across the literature. There is an obvious need for a head-to-head, prospective comparison between these subtypes to determine the safety and efficacy of the chosen intervention. To determine the impact of these differing techniques for subtotal cholecystectomy (namely reconstituting and fenestrating subtypes) as indicated by Tokyo Criteria (Table 1), for the management of the difficult cholecystectomy on short-term and long-term patient outcomes.
