Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Guided Versus Conventional Periapical Endodontic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after guided periapical endodontic surgery versus conventional endodontic surgery.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes after guided periapical endodontic surgery versus conventional endodontic surgery. Patients having mandibular posterior teeth indicated for endodontic surgery will be selected. Full medical and dental history will be obtained from all patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to either guided endodontic surgery or conventional endodontic surgery. Surgical procedures will be done under magnification. Root-end cavities will be filled using MTA.Post surgical instrucions will be given to patients. Surgical time will be recorded. Clinical and radiographic success will be asses at 6 and 12 month.
Age
18 - 50 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Start Date
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2021
Completion Date
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
October 22, 2019
26
ESTIMATED participants
3D guide
DEVICE
Mock guide
DEVICE
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and ConditionsNCT04527705