Neurocognitive Factors in Substance Use Treatment Response: The Ways of Rewarding Abstinence Project

Electrophysiological methods, including event-related potential and functional connectivity approaches, have potential to clarify mechanisms of substance use treatment response and characterize individual differences therein. Veterans are disproportionately affected by disorders of addiction, of which cocaine use disorder (CUD) is particularly problematic due to high relapse rates and the absence of approved pharmacotherapy options. Behavioral interventions for CUD have therefore become an important focus and Contingency Management (CM) has emerged as the best-supported approach. CM involves reinforcing cocaine abstinence (established through objective testing) with reliable, short-term reward, such as chances to win prizes (i.e., Prize-Based CM or PBCM). Given robust empirical support, nationwide dissemination of PBCM has been supported by a VHA initiative since 2011. However, PBCM response rates are variable and long-term benefits are limited - problems magnified by the cost of implementation with respect to staffing and prizes. Measurement-based approaches to PBCM implementation have promise to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of CM programming but have not yet been investigated within the VA or considered in relation to promising neuromarkers. Importantly, two versions of PBCM are already utilized at VA sites and may differentially benefit individuals with distinct neurocognitive profiles. Specifically, VA PBCM programs employ either abstract (voucher prize) or concrete (tangible prize) incentives, the latter of which may more effectively incentivize abstinence in Veterans with poor future-oriented thinking and planning ability. While selection between existing PBCM variants currently reflects practical considerations only, pretreatment neurocognitive functioning could meaningfully and realistically inform clinical decision-making in this regard. This project aims to advance measurement-based implementation of CM by testing a novel neurocognitive model with immediate implications for the use of abstract versus concrete PBCM incentives within the VA. Specifically, the future-minded decision-making (FMDM) model posits that CM scaffolds future-oriented goal representation and self-control to support abstinence during in the moment use-related decision-making. For individuals with greater FMDM impairment, concrete, readily-accessible incentives may be more effective than abstract voucher-based rewards (which require future-oriented thinking and planning to acquire value). To test this model, neurocognitive substrates of FMDM will be examined as predictors of differential treatment response in voucher (VoucherPBCM) versus tangible prize (TangiblePBCM) versions of PBCM. Treatment-related change in neural and cognitive-behavioral correlates of FMDM will also be evaluated in PBCM-adherent versus non-adherent subgroups. Veterans with CUD will be allocated to VoucherPBCM or TangiblePBCM conditions and followed for a 12-week treatment interval. Pre- and post-treatment electroencephalography (EEG) and cognitive-behavioral assessments will be used to measure FMDM-related constructs (working memory, self-control, future-oriented decision-making, future reward representation) and related neuromarkers. These measures will be investigated as predictors of differential treatment response in VoucherPBCM versus TangiblePBCM, as well as maintenance of gains during a post-treatment follow-up period. Change in FMDM-related neural and cognitive measures over the course of treatment will also be evaluated for evidence of neuroadaptation (e.g., changes in functional connectivity) and enhancement of FMDM function through PBCM. Taken together, results of the current research project will represent a first step toward precision implementation of CM within the VA.