Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
External Dacryocystorhinostomy Versus Canalicular Silicone Intubation With Mitomycin C in Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
While external DCR is the gold standard procedure for primary NLDO as well as complicated cases, SI with MMC could achieve comparable success rates in primary acquired NLDO, hence should be considered as an alternative as a safe and minimally invasive procedure.
Purpose: To compare external dacryocystorhinostomy versus canalicular silicone intubation with the use of Mitomycin C (MMC) in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Methods: the study was carried out at the department of Ophthalmology, Menoufia university Hospital, Egypt, between June 2012 to July 2014. Fifty-six patients who were diagnosed with primary acquired NLDO. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: thirty cases underwent external DCR and twenty-six cases underwent silicone intubation with MMC.
Age
21 - 60 years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No
Start Date
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2014
Completion Date
July 31, 2014
Last Updated
December 19, 2018
56
ACTUAL participants
external dacryocystorhinostomy
PROCEDURE
canalicular silicone intubation with MMC
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Menoufia University
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions