Comparing No Mechanical Bowel Preparation With Oral Antibiotics Alone in Patients Undergoing Elective Colon Surgery

The divergence of clinical practice guidelines, in addition to observation from the large North American retrospective studies, suggest that surgeons and centers have not established a standard of care for the preoperative preparation of the bowel prior to colorectal surgery. Specifically, some centers are employing no preparation, others are administering a mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and oral antibiotics and still others are using oral antibiotics alone. Recently, the Canadian Society of Colorectal Surgeons was unable to come to a consensus when attempting to update their preoperative guidelines because of the lack of agreement on best practice (personal communication). This is an important yet controversial topic in colorectal surgery and a clinical trial comparing two standard of care therapies will impact current practice in Canada. The REaCT-NSQIP study compares post-operative surgical infectious complications, length of stay, incidence of C. difficile rates, patient quality of life and cost-effectiveness in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with either no preparation or oral antibiotics. Data will be collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and from patient quality of life questionnaires preoperatively and 30 days postoperatively In this study, it is hypothesized that it is the oral antibiotics, and not the MBP, that is responsible for the reduction in postoperative infectious surgical complications (deep or superficial surgical site infection (SSI)) in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections. This improvement in postoperative infectious complications is not anticipated to result in a clinically significant increase in postoperative C. difficile infections or antibiotic resistant hospital-acquired infections.