Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Polyp Resection Treatments (Hot Snare vs Cold Snare vs Hot EMR vs Cold EMR)
The study will compare the use of cold snare, hot snare, cold EMR, and hot EMR for polyp resection. Although previous studies have compared two of the potential resection methods, no previous study has evaluated all four of the resection methods.
The optimal method for removal of polyps 6-9 and 10-15 mm in size is not established. In this study, we propose to evaluate four different treatments for polyps (sized 6mm-15mm). The four treatments are cold snaring without injection, hot snaring without injection, cold EMR, and hot EMR. This study aims to help to establish the optimal resection technique for 6-9 and 10-15 mm polyps.
Age
40 - No limit years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Start Date
February 6, 2018
Primary Completion Date
May 14, 2021
Completion Date
May 14, 2021
Last Updated
February 15, 2023
238
ACTUAL participants
Cold Snare
PROCEDURE
Hot Snare
PROCEDURE
Cold EMR
PROCEDURE
Hot EMR
PROCEDURE
Lead Sponsor
Indiana University
Collaborators
NCT04704661
NCT04674267
Data Source & Attribution
This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.
View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions